Skip to content
Preprint

More is Less:Optimal Security for Haar Quantum Money and More

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Physics

TL;DR

A construction of quantum money whose asymptotic query security does not deteriorate as long as the number of banknotes available to a user remains below the scale required for state tomography.

Abstract

Quantum cryptography leverages unclonability to enable a wide range of cryptographic applications that are impossible classically, such as digital currency protected against counterfeiting by quantum mechanics. Security requires that no efficient user can produce even one additional valid banknote beyond those already in their possession. However, existing security bounds weaken as the number of banknotes available to a user increases. In this paper, we study a construction of quantum money whose asymptotic query security does not deteriorate as long as the number of banknotes available to a user remains below the scale required for state tomography. In particular, we show that the construction based on an $n$-qubit Haar-random state and a reflection oracle achieves optimal query security: unless a user holds $\Omega(2^n)$ banknotes, their existing banknotes cannot asymptotically speed up counterfeiting --- their best possible attack is the same as if they do not have any banknotes. To establish this result, we develop a framework based on the compressed-oracle technique for defining and analyzing progress measures for quantum tasks such as Haar state cloning. Furthermore, we prove a tight lower bound for generating $r$ additional copies, give a matching attack, and apply our results to quantum copy-protection.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

Protecting Quantum Computers against Untrusted Users

It is shown that security of the restricted model of computation, 1/2BQP_1, is built on not only classical hardness for factoring, but also conjectured circuit lowerbounds for rational reconstruction, which permits arbitrary circuits and system sizes.

S. A. Yadavalli, Joel Rajakumar, A. Schuckert et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Quantum Machine Learning Protection of Military Quantum Key Distribution Against Cryptographically Camouflaged Attacks

Quantum key distribution proves its protocol secure and says nothing about the hardware beneath it, so military and government operators fielding it for command-and-control keys monitor the channel for implementation attacks, and that monitoring has a blind spot. An adversary with a kleptographic foothold in the genera...

Muhammad Shaheer Bin Junaid · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

How Not to Build Microcrypt

A key challenge in quantum cryptography is to build quantum one-wayness and pseudorandomness without the use of (quantum computable) one-way functions. So far, this has turned out to be a difficult task, with only a few proposed candidates that are not directly built from one-way functions. Even within these few propos...

Aditya Gulati, Dakshita Khurana, Kabir Tomer · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Exponential lower bounds for low-degree strategies in position-based quantum cryptography

Non-local quantum computation (NLQC) consists on the implementation of a bipartite unitary $U_{AB}$ by two cooperating distant players by means of a two-round protocol with a single intermediate round of simultaneous communication. It is a major open question to know whether there exists a unitary $U_{AB}$ whose implem...

Isabel M. Moreno-Cuadrado, David Pérez-García, C. Palazuelos · 1 citation
Book Open access Nov 2026

Hybrid Quantum–Computational Key Distribution with Reduced Assumptions (Short Paper)

The HM-QCT protocol, presented by Mazzoncini et al. in 2025, uses a unique feature of quantum information to achieve quantum key distribution (QKD) with secret-key rates beyond standard constructions. The protocol has been designed in the hybrid quantum-computational time-lock (QCT) security model which imposes two ind...

Jean Snyman, Ioana Boureanu, Daniel Gardham · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning

Secret sharing is ubiquitous throughout cryptography. All possible access structures are classically feasible, and in the case of threshold access structures, the protocols are even very efficient. However, when moving to the quantum setting, the no-cloning theorem shows that many access structures are impossible. In f...

Steve Chien, Ishani Mukherjee, Mark Zhandry · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.