Evaluating PDPL Compliance in E-Commerce Websites: Insights and Lessons Learned from Human and LLM Analyses
Eman AlashwaliAbeer Alhuzali
Oct 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
In 2024, Saudi Arabia's Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) came into force. However, little work has been done to assess its implementation. In this paper, we analyzed 100 e-commerce websites operating in Saudi Arabia against the PDPL, examining the presence of a privacy policy and, if present, the policy's declarations of four items pertaining to personal data rights and practices: 1) personal data retention period, 2) the right to request the destruction of personal data, 3) the right to request a copy of personal data, and 4) a mechanism for filing complaints. Our results show that, despite national awareness and support efforts, a significant fraction of e-commerce websites in our dataset are not fully compliant with the examined PDPL requirements at the privacy policy level: only 31% of websites in our dataset declared all four examined items in their privacy policies. Second, the majority of top-ranked e-commerce websites in our dataset (based on search results order) and those hosted on local e-commerce hosting platforms exhibited significantly higher non-compliance rates than mid- to low-ranked websites and those not hosted on local e-commerce platforms. Third, we explored the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an automated tool for privacy policy analysis to measure compliance with the PDPL, using the GPT-5 model. We highlight the potential of LLMs and suggest considerations that can inform future benchmarks aimed at improving LLM-based automated analysis for privacy policies. Our results provide a step forward in understanding implementation barriers to data protection laws, especially in non-Western contexts. We provide recommendations for policymakers, regulators, website owners, and developers seeking to improve data protection practices and automate compliance monitoring.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.