Traversability-Aware Cooperative Path Planning for Human-UGV Casualty Evacuation
Kristian DallandPrithvi PoddarSouma ChowdhuryKarthik DantuEhsan T. Esfahani
Oct 2026
RoboticsHuman-computer Interaction
Abstract
Heterogeneous multi-robot path planning is a well-studied problem in which agents with disparate kinematic and dynamic models must coordinate to achieve shared objectives. These formulations, however, treat all agents as robotic-their cost models are mechanical and their traversability is sensor-derived. In human-robot teaming, the human partner remains relegated to command and supervisory roles rather than being modeled as a physical co-navigator with distinct mobility constraints and dynamic energy reserves. This work investigates joint path planning for a two-agent human-UGV team in search-and-rescue casualty retrieval scenarios. We model the human agent using the Pandolf-Santee metabolic cost model with fatigue-modulated speed, and the UGV using a rolling-resistance energy model with terrain-dependent speed limits. By exploiting the complementary traversability of each agent-the human's ability to traverse dense vegetation and shallow water versus the UGV's superior speed on open terrain and roads-we optimize casualty transfer locations, termed switch points, to minimize total mission time. Evaluated across multiple synthetic 1km2 environments with procedurally generated elevation and land-cover data, the optimized strategy reduces mean mission time by 5.3% relative to a human-only baseline and by 7.0% relative to a naive human-UGV strategy without switch point optimization, while reducing human energy expenditure by 17.8% relative to baseline. Notably, the naive strategy reduces human energy expenditure by a larger margin (22.4%) but incurs a 2% increase in mission time relative to baseline, illustrating that switch point optimization is necessary to realize time savings from human-UGV teaming.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.