Conventional large-language-model chat interfaces typically follow user-initiated turns: each request elicits a response, after which the system waits for further input. Human asynchronous communication instead unfolds over time through message bursts, delays, silence, resumed topics, and self-initiated contact. Proactive dialogue therefore requires not only deciding when to speak, but also managing pending conversational actions and allowing them to be revised as context evolves. We introduce Proactive AI, a framework for proactive dialogue built around replannable temporal message queues. The framework treats interaction as a continuous event timeline and unsent conversational actions as revisable state. A user event, dialogue-pacemaker event, or scheduled decision may yield silence, one or more immediate messages, or future conversational actions. The system may also observe a user message without an immediate visible response and defer the response decision. Before delivery, every planned message must be reconsidered against the current context; reaching a scheduled time does not itself authorize delivery. We provide a formal semantics that characterizes when future conversational actions may be revised, withdrawn, or executed as context evolves. The framework extends AI participation beyond responses to current requests, enabling self-initiated exchanges without new requests, sustained follow-up over time, and revisions of subsequent actions as context evolves. It provides an executable basis for long-term human-AI interaction in tutoring, scientific collaboration, and everyday companionship.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.