Beyond Phones: Structured Phonemic Modeling for Vietnamese Automatic Speech Recognition
Nghia Hieu NguyenQuan Ngoc HoangLong Hoang Huu NguyenKiet Van NguyenNgan Luu-Thuy Nguyen
Oct 2026
Natural Language Processing
Abstract
Phone-based representations provide a compact and acoustically grounded alternative to conventional orthographic modeling for automatic speech recognition (ASR). However, phones describe surface pronunciations and may lose lexical distinctions under dialect-dependent sound mergers, making their conversion back to orthographic text inherently ambiguous. This issue is particularly relevant to Vietnamese, where pronunciation varies considerably across regional dialects.
This work proposes a structured phonemic approach to Vietnamese ASR that moves the output representation from surface phones to abstract phonemes. Exploiting the regular phoneme-grapheme correspondence of Vietnamese, each syllable is represented by a phonemic triplet consisting of its initial, rhyme, and tone, preserving lexical distinctions while enabling deterministic reconstruction of orthographic text. We further introduce a \textbf{Phonemic Syllabic-Structure Decoder} that captures the hierarchical organization of Vietnamese syllables by first predicting the rhyme and subsequently conditioning the initial and tone predictions on the rhyme.
Experiments on the standard LSVSC and multi-dialect UIT-ViMD benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The best models achieve WERs of 5.83\% on LSVSC and 12.58\% on UIT-ViMD, outperforming orthographic, phonetic, and previous phonemic approaches. Further analyses reveal broader lexical coverage, reduced dependence on word-frequency patterns, and consistent behavior across Vietnamese dialects. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of moving from phonetic to structured phonemic modeling and highlight the importance of incorporating language-specific phonological structure into end-to-end ASR.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· PeerJ· 216 citations· ⚡13
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.