It is concluded that the postdictive montage of perception is reflected in V1, implemented through a delaying feedback loop with higher-order sensory cortex, extending the role V1 plays in perceptual inference: beyond receiving sensory inputs reflecting the present and predictions of the future, it is involved in the post-hoc revision of perception.
Abstract
One of the most puzzling aspects of perception is postdiction: later information can change how a previous stimulus is perceived [1,2]. This indicates that perception is not a livestream of the external world, but rather a post-hoc reconstruction. How does the brain revise perception? It has been proposed that recurrent processing in the sensory hierarchy may sustain earlier information long enough for later information to impact it [3]. We hypothesised that this allows feedback from higher-order multisensory regions to alter the representation of earlier visual stimuli in the primary visual cortex (V1) [4]. Here, we tested this hypothesis using two postdictive illusions [5], where the presence or absence of a tone determines whether an illusory flash is perceived, or an actually presented flash is perceptually suppressed, respectively. This allowed us to isolate neural signals reflecting illusory percepts from sensory inputs in retinotopic space. We collected 7T layer-specific fMRI data while participants (N=23) experienced the illusions. We found that postdictive illusions induced similar activity patterns as real percepts, specifically in the deep layers of V1, suggesting postdictive feedback. Informational connectivity analyses suggested that the source of this feedback was the Superior Temporal Cortex (STC). We conclude that the postdictive montage of perception is reflected in V1, implemented through a delaying feedback loop with higher-order sensory cortex. This extends the role V1 plays in perceptual inference: beyond receiving sensory inputs reflecting the present and predictions of the future, it is involved in the post-hoc revision of perception.
We investigate how information processing in the early visual cortex, which is tuned to the statistical regularities of sensory inputs, depends critically on the context in which those inputs occur. Neurobiologically inspired computational frameworks of visual processing emphasise functional interactions between higher...
Zi-Rui Zhang, Clement Abbatecola, Angus Paton et al.· Current Research in Neurobio...· 0 citations
Flexible behavior in complex environments requires animals to infer which sensory inputs are relevant for guiding action and which need to be ignored. Yet, how cognitive control circuits apply contextual knowledge during decision-making is poorly understood. To address this question, we trained head-fixed mice on a cro...
K. Safaryan, Rohan Bhalodia, Jonathan Shenassa et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Summary Conscious visual phenomenology comprises multiple representational levels, from basic features to integrated percepts, raising the question of how the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) differentiate accordingly. Event-related potential (ERP) studies identified early occipitotemporal negativities as relia...
Annika Hense, Antje Peters, T. Dellert et al.· iScience· 0 citations
Visual input is often incomplete, requiring the brain to infer missing information from prior experience or contextual cues. Establishing whether memory-derived and context-derived information shape pattern completion through shared or distinct top-down pathways is central to understanding how perception emerges from t...
Context modulates sensory processing. Recent proposals claim early areas like primary visual cortex (V1) are only influenced by "local" context (e.g., recent stimulus history), while "global" context (e.g., learned patterns and probabilities) modulates only higher areas. We tested this using a global/local oddball para...
Darcy S. Peterka, Fumiyasu Imai, Jordan M. Ross et al.· Cell Reports· 0 citations
It is commonly thought that information supporting conscious perception is primarily represented in sensory cortices, whereas association cortex encodes more abstract, task-dependent information. However, this impression may partly stem from difficulties in experimentally assessing the functions of association areas ch...
Ali Moharramipour, Zhi-Yong Jin, Ning Su et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.