Skip to content
#edge computing Review Open access

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES AND THE INTERNET OF THINGS IN AGRICULTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGICAL DIRECTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS

Oct 2026 · Advanced Information Systems · 0 citations · 197 references

TL;DR

The obtained results provide a holistic assessment of the state and structure of the research field on UAV and IoT applications in agriculture and can serve as a basis for shaping further research programs and educational courses in precision agriculture.

Abstract

Relevance. Modern agriculture is undergoing a profound cyber-physical transformation driven by the need to shift from extensive to precision, high-accuracy, and environmentally balanced production methods. The technological foundation of this transition is the integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and wireless Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, which together form the concept of Agriculture 5.0. Despite the rapid growth of publications on this topic, the accumulated body of research remains fragmented across directions (computer vision, network technologies, robotics, adoption economics), which complicates the formation of a holistic picture of the field and of priority directions for further research. The subject of this study are methods and technologies of applying UAVs and IoT networks to precision-agriculture tasks. The purpose of the article to systematize and classify current scientific research on the use of UAVs and IoT in agriculture, and to determine the leading technological directions, their quantitative proportions, and promising development vectors. The following results were obtained. A total of 198 scientific publications from 2024-2026 were processed and classified into seven thematic classes: crop health and biological threat monitoring, hardware engineering, edge computing and spraying, navigation, swarm intelligence and data collection, phenotyping, biomass and yield forecasting, soil science, water balance and precision irrigation, economics, ecology and socio-cultural perception, and specialized agrotechnical operations. For each class, consolidated tables of applied methods and results, as well as diagrams revealing the internal structure of the direction, were constructed. The dominance of navigation/swarm-control tasks and biological-threat monitoring was identified, along with key technical barriers (limited battery energy density, beyond-visual-line-of-sight flight regulations, and fragmentation of data-exchange standards). Conclusion. The obtained results provide a holistic assessment of the state and structure of the research field on UAV and IoT applications in agriculture and can serve as a basis for shaping further research programs and educational courses in precision agriculture. Future research directions concern improving the energy autonomy of platforms, standardizing data-exchange protocols, and developing edge artificial-intelligence models resilient to complex field conditions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.