UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES AND THE INTERNET OF THINGS IN AGRICULTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGICAL DIRECTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS
TL;DR
The obtained results provide a holistic assessment of the state and structure of the research field on UAV and IoT applications in agriculture and can serve as a basis for shaping further research programs and educational courses in precision agriculture.
Abstract
Relevance. Modern agriculture is undergoing a profound cyber-physical transformation driven by the need to shift from extensive to precision, high-accuracy, and environmentally balanced production methods. The technological foundation of this transition is the integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and wireless Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, which together form the concept of Agriculture 5.0. Despite the rapid growth of publications on this topic, the accumulated body of research remains fragmented across directions (computer vision, network technologies, robotics, adoption economics), which complicates the formation of a holistic picture of the field and of priority directions for further research. The subject of this study are methods and technologies of applying UAVs and IoT networks to precision-agriculture tasks. The purpose of the article to systematize and classify current scientific research on the use of UAVs and IoT in agriculture, and to determine the leading technological directions, their quantitative proportions, and promising development vectors. The following results were obtained. A total of 198 scientific publications from 2024-2026 were processed and classified into seven thematic classes: crop health and biological threat monitoring, hardware engineering, edge computing and spraying, navigation, swarm intelligence and data collection, phenotyping, biomass and yield forecasting, soil science, water balance and precision irrigation, economics, ecology and socio-cultural perception, and specialized agrotechnical operations. For each class, consolidated tables of applied methods and results, as well as diagrams revealing the internal structure of the direction, were constructed. The dominance of navigation/swarm-control tasks and biological-threat monitoring was identified, along with key technical barriers (limited battery energy density, beyond-visual-line-of-sight flight regulations, and fragmentation of data-exchange standards). Conclusion. The obtained results provide a holistic assessment of the state and structure of the research field on UAV and IoT applications in agriculture and can serve as a basis for shaping further research programs and educational courses in precision agriculture. Future research directions concern improving the energy autonomy of platforms, standardizing data-exchange protocols, and developing edge artificial-intelligence models resilient to complex field conditions.