FormStruct-Bench is introduced, a hierarchical and diagnostic benchmark that evaluates table-form document structure recognition at both the document level and progressively finer component levels, allowing aggregate performance to be traced back to specific structural failure modes.
Abstract
Transforming table-form documents into machine-processable records requires recovering not only their visible content but also the multilevel structure that organizes it. However, existing benchmarks evaluate either holistic document outputs or conventional table grids, and their aggregate scores provide little insight into where structural failures occur. We introduce FormStruct-Bench, a hierarchical and diagnostic benchmark that evaluates table-form document structure recognition at both the document level and progressively finer component levels, allowing aggregate performance to be traced back to specific structural failure modes. To construct auditable ground truth at scale, we annotate 70 reusable templates and expand them into 7,000 verified instances through a provenance-preserving Director--Artist--Verifier pipeline; all 1,100 instances in the template-disjoint test set additionally receive human review. Our evaluation protocol uses five primary metrics and three structure-specific diagnostics across page, schema, and component levels, together with slices over difficulty, structural constraints, and visual degradation. Across 14 API-hosted and locally deployable systems plus two SFT variants, the best document-level score reaches 83.85%, whereas the best reported fine-grained structural score remains below 18%. These results reveal a pronounced gap between reading document content and recovering the hierarchy and regional organization required for reliable table-form understanding.
Long-document question-answering experiments show that human-verified TOC hierarchies and contextual relationships improve reasoning, with their combination providing complementary benefits.
Yuefeng Zou, Yi-Chen Lu, Jingxiao Yang et al.· 0 citations
LlamaExtract Agentic Plus ranks first on all three metrics, with accuracy comparable to coding agents at a fraction of the cost, and is the first to score value accuracy, record completeness at scale, grounding, and measured cost together.
Boyang Zhang, Adrian Lyjak, Elizabeth Stewart et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
In visually-rich documents, information is encoded not only in individual page objects such as tables, headers, and text blocks, but also in the structural relations among them, making document structure analysis fundamental to information retrieval and document understanding. However, accurately inferring such relatio...
Bohou Li, Ben Sowell, Mehul A. Shah et al.· 0 citations
Doc2DB-Bench is introduced, a benchmark for Document-to-Database construction, containing 203 long-document instances across 42 schemas and seven domain groups, with 117 entity tables, 132 relationship tables, 7,341 rows, and 41,935 cells, which provides a testbed for reliable, auditable, and relationally faithful LLM-...
Zhuo-Wen Liang, Zhengxuan Zhang, Jia-Yang Wang et al.· 1 citation
This work presents DocMaster, a hierarchical structure-aware document analysis system that parses documents into hierarchical document trees preserving original layouts and constructs a structure-aware semantic index that enables accurate document filtering and in-depth analysis.
Ziqi Chen, Yingli Zhou, Fangyuan Zhang et al.· 0 citations
By bridging the gap between visually complex documents and machine-readable knowledge, Docling provides a foundation for reliable document understanding in next-generation AI systems.
P. Staar· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.