Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Edge-Based Fruit Quality Assessment Using an AI-Driven Electronic Nose

Oct 2026 · Engineering Research Express · 0 citations

TL;DR

A smart fruit spoilage detection system that combines advanced gas sensing with deep learning for real-time monitoring and automated decision-making and enabling low-latency, real-time inference in IoT environments is presented.

Abstract

Ensuring food safety and minimizing waste remain key challenges across domestic and industrial contexts. This paper presents a smart fruit spoilage detection system that combines advanced gas sensing with deep learning for real-time monitoring and automated decision-making. The system employs an electronic nose (E-nose) with nine gas sensors to identify early indicators of fruit spoilage, thereby improving hygiene and reducing health risks. To achieve accurate and efficient classification, three deep learning models Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM) and hybrid CNN-LSTM architectures were evaluated. The LSTM achieved the best results with 97.03% accuracy, a 2.57 MB model size,and an inference time of 133.2 ms. To overcome the constraints of edge computing, several model compression techniques were explored. Among them, the knowledge distillation approach achieved the best trade-off, reducing the model size by 78.3% while incurring only a 0.71% accuracy loss. The optimized model was subsequently deployed on an ARM-based microcontroller integrated with nine gas sensors, achieving an overall accuracy of 90% and enabling low-latency, real-time inference in IoT environments. Compact, efficient and scalable, the proposed system provides a complete end-to-end solution from sensing to embedded deployment for intelligent food safety monitoring applications.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.