Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Edge Computing-Based Building Energy Management Systems for Campus Buildings: A Comparative Evaluation of Weighted-Sum and Pareto-Based Multi-Objective Optimization Methods on a Raspberry Pi 5

Oct 2026 · Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research · 0 citations · 25 references

TL;DR

The findings confirm that the proposed edge-based BEMS framework is both computationally feasible and effective, offering practical guidance for selecting between weighted-sum and Pareto-based optimization strategies in real-time campus energy management.

Abstract

Recent advancements in Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) have integrated Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing technologies to enhance energy efficiency. Most existing studies focus on simulation-based evaluations or cloud-centric architectures, while comparative evaluations of optimization algorithms on resource-constrained edge devices remain underexplored. This study proposes an edge-based BEMS framework and systematically evaluates the performance of four multi-objective optimization algorithms, namely weighted-sum Genetic Algorithm (GA), weighted-sum Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Multi-Objective GA (MOGA), and Multi-Objective PSO (MOPSO), implemented directly on a Raspberry Pi 5 device. The weighted-sum GA and PSO are single-objective scalarization approaches applied to a multi-objective problem, whereas MOGA and MOPSO are true Pareto-based multi-objective optimization methods. The optimization objectives are to minimize energy consumption and occupant thermal discomfort simultaneously and the considered algorithms were evaluated using real-world sensor data from an IoT-based monitoring system in five campus rooms over a period of five days. The experimental results show that PSO-based methods, specifically the weighted-sum PSO with a discomfort weight of 0.5, which achieved the lowest Euclidean distance to the ideal point of 4.46, outperformed the GA-based methods. Among Pareto-based methods, MOPSO produced a smoother and more uniformly distributed Pareto front than MOGA, with a superior knee-point solution (Euclidean distance of 5.59). Energy savings of 14.19% were achieved by the weighted-sum PSO with a discomfort weight of 0.1. The execution times were below 0.03 s with an average CPU load of approximately 25%. The findings confirm that the proposed edge-based BEMS framework is both computationally feasible and effective, offering practical guidance for selecting between weighted-sum and Pareto-based optimization strategies in real-time campus energy management.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.