Skip to content
#edge computing Conference Open access

From QoS to QoE: Rethinking Multimedia Quality in the Era of 5G, AI, and Immersivity

Oct 2026 · Proceedings of International Conference on Innovation in Computing, Science, Engineering and Technology · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

As multimedia services evolve from conventional image/video toward immersive and interactive experiences, the traditional network-centric definition of service quality is becoming increasingly insufficient [1]–[5]. Historical network management frameworks have traditionally relied on objective, network-layer performance indicators such as throughput, latency, jitter, and packet loss. However, these parameters alone cannot adequately explain how users perceive and evaluate the quality of immersive and context-dependent multimedia experiences [2]–[6]. This plenary explores the transition from conventional Quality of Service (QoS) centric network management toward a human-centric Quality of Experience (QoE) paradigm for 5G and beyond [2], [3], [7]. Objective No Reference Quality Metrics (NRQMs), designed based on Artificial intelligence (AI), estimate multimedia quality without requiring a pristine reference and are being increasingly important for estimating perceptual-quality in real-time in 5G and beyond networks [6],[7],[13][15]. The presentation further examines how key 5G and beyond network technologies, including Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC), and Network Slicing can provide the architectural foundation for QoE-aware service delivery. The integration of these capabilities with AI techniques opens the possibility of predictive, autonomous, and closed-loop QoE management [6]–[14]. Finally, the plenary discusses how telecommunication service providers can unlock new business values and modernize their offers by transitioning from Service Level Agreement (SLA) based services to Experience Level Agreement (ELA) based service model [11] [16].

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.