Skip to content
Preprint

Decodable But Not Detachable: Training Data Granularity Determines Parametric Modularity in Large Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 20 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work applies a uniform causal methodology across two domain granularities, three model families, and eight domains to identify domain-specific parametric shells: concentrated, causally necessary neuron populations whose removal selectively degrades a target domain while sparing others.

Abstract

Do large language models contain domain-specific parametric shells: concentrated, causally necessary neuron populations whose removal selectively degrades a target domain while sparing others? We apply a uniform causal methodology across two domain granularities, three model families (1.5B to 7B parameters), and eight domains. At the academic subject level, zero neurons exceed 60\% domain selectivity across 939,008 combined FFN neurons and causal damage matrices are flat, despite domain identity being linearly decodable above 85\% accuracy. At the language and modality level, 0.65--1.14\% of neurons exceed 60\% selectivity, damage matrices are near-perfectly diagonal (ratios up to 595:1), and shell neuron sets are essentially disjoint (IoU $<0.003$). Masking code-selective neurons reduces mathematical reasoning accuracy by 16--24 percentage points across all models; masking Spanish or Chinese neurons leaves it at or below random. Shell strength increases monotonically with scale and shells are spatially interleaved in a pattern that precludes group-level selective quantization. Parametric shells form where and only where training data was modular at the token level.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

LegoLM: Structured Weight Sharing for Large Language Models

It is discovered that outlier dominance grows with model scale: full replacement at K=128 degrades GPT-2 small but catastrophically degrades Mistral-7B by +1,134,279%, while selective replacement at p=99% rescues both models to under +15%.

Joseph Bingham · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction

The results show that the LLM's capability dissolves with dimension in a way no noise-corrupted classical learner mimics - which explains why LLMs, so capable elsewhere, keep losing to fifty-year-old baselines on tables, while leaving the mechanism of the prediction as an open question.

M. Garnelo, Wojciech M. Czarnecki · 1 citation
Jul 2026

Convolution for Large Language Models

These results support depthwise convolution as a lightweight complement to self-attention for modeling short-range token interactions and suggest that the convolution makes repeated token IDs more sensitive to their immediate context.

Yu-Chuan Tian, Yingte Shu, Wei He et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Located but Not Releasable: Silent Gate Inversion and Bounded Linear Release

The complete pipeline -- detect, localize, and release -- is submitted to a fully preregistered stress test on a 25.7M transformer trained on causal-evidence discrimination, where a known suppression phenomenon (latent causal structure present but behaviorally unused) has previously been documented.

Xi-Ning Xun · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Capability-Stratified Degradation in Ternary Language Models

Extreme low-bit inference offers a route toward smaller models and constrained deployment. Ternary language models restrict weights to $\{-1,0,+1\}$, approaching the limit of $\log_2 3 \approx 1.585$ bits/weight. The practical question for a pretrained model is not simply whether weights can be quantised but which capabilities survive and whether it remains useful for adaptation. We explore this by converting Qwen3.5-0.8B (752M parameters) to ternary weights using 72.4M tokens of quantisation-aware training (QAT). The resulting model, Cloe, is evaluated across 29 benchmarks, representation diagnostics, and downstream fine-tuning. The evidence shows non-uniform degradation. A linear probe recovers 43.76% of MMLU answers from the full-precision teacher's representations but only 26.19% from Cloe (near chance), indicating specialist factual information is lost. However, Cloe retains measurable performance on ten tasks, averaging 77.1% of teacher performance. Crucially, fine-tuning raises Cloe to 89.8% on SST-2 (95.6% of the matched teacher) and reaches 79.4% teacher retention on XSum. We attribute degradation to a combination of quantisation-induced information loss and incomplete recovery due to the limited QAT budget. We also highlight an evaluation pitfall: standard answer-letter scoring failed (Cloe emitted"A"on 98.6% of MMLU questions), necessitating continuation scoring. Ultimately, ternary conversion is unsuitable as a drop-in general replacement yet remains valuable as a compact substrate for task-specific models.

AI OneBit, A. Malik, Poojith et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.