Sep 2026· Dibon journal of education· Vol 2, pp. 732-753· 0 citations· 16 references
TL;DR
It is indicated that integration of GenAI into nursing education requires more than training in the use of the technology, and nurses’ readiness to integrate GenAI varied greatly and was influenced more by professional trust than by ability to use GenAI.
Abstract
Higher education, including nursing education, is increasingly visible when using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in teaching. These tools open new opportunities but also raise critical questions about clinical reasoning, professional judgment, and patient safety. This study explores nurse educators' experiences using GenAI in nursing education, including their readiness to adapt teaching practices and professional roles, their perceptions of opportunities and challenges, and the required competencies and institutional support. This study used a qualitative exploratory descriptive research design. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to select seven nurse educators with more than two years of teaching experience and prior exposure to GenAI. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews via Zoom and analyzed the data using thematic analysis. Nurse educators’ readiness to integrate GenAI varied greatly and was influenced more by professional trust than by ability to use GenAI. Accuracy of GenAI-generated content was a critical factor in developing trust and needed verification. The threat of students losing their clinical judgment when using AI was a major concern for all participants. They felt that GenAI should be used in a ‘supportive’ manner, while hands-on teaching and direct interaction between the educator and student remained central to learning. Participants felt that they lacked formal training in GenAI and instead learned through self-directed learning and guidance from peers. Many wanted more guidance from their institutions, but differed on the level of support or restrictions needed for safe integration. The findings indicate that integration of GenAI into nursing education requires more than training in the use of the technology.
BACKGROUND
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping nursing education. Although many studies have examined AI use among nursing faculty and students, little is known about how clinical preceptors, who supervise students in practice settings, understand, perceive, and use these tools. As students...
BACKGROUND
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, creating opportunities and challenges related to academic integrity, educator readiness, and policy clarity, particularly in nursing education.
PURPOSE
To examine nurse educator and student perspectives on GAI use, institutiona...
Helena Nadder, Barbara J. Patterson· Nurse Educator· 0 citations
Background: Nurse educators prepare nursing students for safe, competent, ethical and compassionate practice. Understanding what students expect of them can inform the quality of nursing education.
Aim: This narrative review synthesizes published evidence on nursing students’ expectations of effective nurse educators...
S. Jayasena· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Background The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has brought new opportunities to nursing education, while raising numerous concerns. Existing research has primarily focused on nursing students’ acceptance, attitudes, and willingness to use GenAI, whereas studies exploring their experience...
Weng-Hao Wan, Xin Yu, Qian-Wen Guo et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
The quality of theoretical assessments in undergraduate nursing education is crucial to shaping students’ clinical reasoning, professional judgment, and overall readiness for professional practice. Despite growing emphasis on competency-based education, persistent challenges, including cognitive misalignment, inconsist...
G. Donough, K. Mthimunye, F. Daniels· African Journal of Nursing a...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
In nursing education, a significant body of knowledge essential for professional practice is tacit-difficult to articulate, yet crucial for clinical judgment, ethical comportment, and professional identity formation. Understanding how clinical nurse educators perceive and transmit this tacit knowledge is cri...
Ming Zhou, Xing Gao, Xiao-Fei Wu et al.· Nurse Education Today· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.