Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Exact results for Kerr black holes: shadow areas and perimeters, capture of slow particles, and escape from near extremal horizons

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

We give exact results for several observables of Kerr black holes that have so far been computed numerically, by fits, or only at isolated parameter values. (i) The area of the shadow seen by an equatorial observer, for every spin, in complete elliptic integrals, together with its small-spin series and its near-extremal expansion A = 16π + 15√3 + (3π/√2)√(1−a) + …; the shadow area of an extremal black hole at every inclination; and a single short integral for arbitrary spin and inclination. (ii) The perimeter of the shadow, equal to 18√3 M for a maximally spinning hole seen edge-on. (iii) The capture cross-section of a Kerr black hole for slow particles arriving perpendicular to the spin, σ = [7π + π√(1−a²) + 16√(1+a) E(2a/(1+a))] M²/v², the corresponding angular-momentum accretion in closed form, and the isotropically averaged cross-section and spin-down at maximal spin in elementary closed form. (iv) Escape probabilities for photons emitted isotropically just outside the horizon of an extremal Kerr–Newman black hole at any latitude, P = 1/2 − arcsin(k)/(2π) − k/4, and from the innermost stable circular orbit at any charge, together with escaping energy fractions and escape probabilities for massive particles. Known special cases are recovered and credited. All results were checked against independent high-precision numerical computations. AI disclosure: This work was carried out with substantial assistance from an AI system, Claude (Anthropic), used through the Claude Code software, under the author's direction. The AI system proposed research directions, wrote and ran the computer-algebra and numerical code, performed the derivations and checks, searched the literature, and drafted the text. The author directed the work and is responsible for its publication. Novelty assessments are based on literature searches and may be incomplete.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.