Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Real-Time Two-Stage Screening Framework for UAV Autonomous Landing in Unknown Environments

Oct 2026 · Figshare

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of autonomous landing of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in unknown environments by proposing a vision-based system that utilizes a single RGB-D camera. The core of our approach integrates an enhanced real-time semantic segmentation model based on the DDRNet architecture, incorporating structural re-parameterization (RDBlock), effi cient context aggregation (Fast-DAPPM), and boundary optimization (BOM). The model achieves a 97% inference speed improvement (65 FPS vs. 33 FPS for the baseline) while increasing mean intersection over union (mIoU) by 1.04 percentage points on AeroScapes. It also achieves 73.23% mIoU on the combined Drone-Landing dataset. The landing framework combines semantic-based candidate selection with depth-based geometric verifi cation in a two-stage process. A safety region defi ned by the UAV’s physical dimensions is updated in image coordinates using depth measurements, while a four-subdomain fl atness assessment evaluates local terrain conditions. During descent, potentially dynamic obstacles entering the selected landing region trigger hovering and, if occupancy persists, a climb followed by landing-region reassessment. Flight experiments demonstrate the feasibility of the system in representative static multitarget, dynamic-intrusion, and gully-terrain scenarios. Implemented on edge computing platforms, our solution provides a computationally efficient approach for autonomous UAV landing, integrating semantic risk screening, geometric verifi cation, and obstacle monitoring within a unifi ed perception and control framework.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.