Skip to content

ACAAI - Accountability by Design for Agentic AI: A Lifecycle Framework for Engineering Accountability in Autonomous AI Systems

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving from systems that generate recommendations and content towards autonomous agents capable of planning, reasoning, interacting with external systems, using tools and executing actions with limited human intervention. As AI systems become more agentic, accountability can no longer be understood solely as a legal obligation or post-incident governance exercise. It must also become an operational property embedded into the design, deployment and operation of autonomous AI systems. ACAAI (Accountability by Design for Agentic AI) approaches accountability as a systems engineering property that emerges from the coordinated implementation of organizational and technical controls rather than from any single governance mechanism. Building upon principles from AI governance, cybersecurity, safety engineering, resilience engineering and AI assurance, the framework translates existing governance principles into more than 100 organizational and technical controls spanning the lifecycle of agentic AI systems. ACAAI is structured around six complementary control domains: (1) Organizational Governance, (2) Human Oversight, Consent and Decision Authority, (3) Identity, Authority and Data Governance, (4) Observability, Explainability and Evidence, (5) Runtime Safety and Assurance, and (6) Incident Response and Recovery. Rather than proposing a new regulatory model or prescriptive implementation methodology, ACAAI provides a structured engineering foundation for designing, deploying, operating and retiring accountable autonomous AI systems. The framework also dentifies research and implementation challenges that remain as agentic AI systems become increasingly autonomous, interconnected and collaborative.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.