Skip to content
Open access

Integrated Cardio–Renal–Metabolic Risk Profiling in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Machine Learning-Assisted Cross-Sectional Analysis

Sep 2026 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · Vol 15 · 0 citations · 37 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by overlapping cardiovascular, renal, metabolic, and hepatic-risk abnormalities. We characterized this integrated phenotype, examined SCORE2-Diabetes gradients, and assessed whether routinely available variables could classify established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 232 consecutive adults with T2DM. SCORE2-Diabetes tertiles in the full cohort were analyzed descriptively, and a sensitivity analysis was restricted to participants aged 40–69 years without established ASCVD or severe target-organ damage. FIB-4 was recalculated from age, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count. Elastic-net logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting were evaluated using nested stratified five-fold cross-validation, with all preprocessing and hyperparameter tuning confined to the training folds. Results: Established ASCVD was present in 49 participants (21.1%), corresponding to 4.45 events per candidate predictor. The SCORE2-Diabetes-eligible sensitivity subgroup included 118 participants (50.9%); 72.9% were in the ≥20% 10-year-risk category. FIB-4 was available for 231 participants (median 1.26 [IQR 0.96–1.80]). Nested cross-validated ROC AUCs were 0.675 (95% CI 0.582–0.763) for elastic-net logistic regression, 0.670 (0.581–0.754) for random forest, and 0.674 (0.589–0.752) for gradient boosting; balanced accuracies were 65.4%, 62.8%, and 56.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The cohort had a high and heterogeneous cardio–renal–metabolic burden. SCORE2-Diabetes findings from the full cohort are descriptive because the score is not intended for patients with established ASCVD or severe target-organ damage. The machine-learning models showed only modest, internally validated discrimination and are not suitable for clinical deployment without larger prospective cohorts and external validation.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.