Skip to content
Review Open access

AC FEEDBACK ON EFL STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC WRITING: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS

Sep 2026 · Journal of Global Scientific Innovations · 0 citations

TL;DR

The reviewed studies indicate that ChatGPT-generated feedback can contribute to improvements in several aspects of writing, including grammar, conciseness, organization, vocabulary, cohesion, and revision, at the same time, the studies identify limitations related to feedback quality, contextual appropriateness, accuracy, and students’ dependence on AI.

Abstract

Academic writing is one of the challenging skills for students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL), as it requires grammatical accuracy, appropriate vocabulary, logical organization, coherence, cohesion, and clear expression of ideas. Feedback plays an important role in helping learners identify weaknesses and revise their written work. This article examines the opportunities and limitations of AI-generated feedback, particularly feedback provided by ChatGPT, in EFL academic writing. A literature-based review was conducted using recent empirical and review studies on AI-assisted writing feedback. The reviewed studies indicate that ChatGPT-generated feedback can contribute to improvements in several aspects of writing, including grammar, conciseness, organization, vocabulary, cohesion, and revision. At the same time, the studies identify limitations related to feedback quality, contextual appropriateness, accuracy, and students’ dependence on AI.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

The Impact of ChatGPT on EFL Learners' Writing Performance

EFL learners often face difficulties in constructing coherent, well-written texts. With the rapid development of AI technologies, increasing interest has emerged in their ability to support language learning, especially writing. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of using Artificial Intelligence tools, speci...

M. M. Ahmad, Aram George Simon, Sarah A. Khuder et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

AI-mediated feedback in L2 writing: effects on performance, engagement and instructor perspectives in an Armenian university context

Written corrective feedback (WCF) is a cornerstone of second language (L2) writing instruction, and the emergence of AI-based tools has substantially transformed its delivery. However, a critical conceptual distinction exists between AI tools that provide corrective feedback on linguistic form, such as Grammarly and Ca...

Luiza Marabyan, Lilit Avetisyan, Marine Avetisyan et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of EAL Academic Writing: The Effectiveness of Dialogic Feedback

This study examined the effectiveness of dialogic feedback (DF) as an approach to feedback on English as an additional language (EAL) academic writing at the tertiary level, in comparison with traditional written commentaries. Adopting a mixed-methods design, the study investigated both writing performance outcomes and...

Anna Krulatz, Georgios Neokleous, Tülay Dixon et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Transforming EFL Writing Education: Possible Contributions of AI Training to Language Classroom Engagement and Achievement

The effects of AI-supported writing instruction on tertiary-level EFL students’ language classroom engagement (LCE) and writing achievement and Qualitative findings indicated increased self-confidence and self-reflection.

N. Erdemir, Hazal Tekeli, İdil Sayın · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.