GMTW-Ro is introduced, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether large language models can reliably follow complex instructions in Romanian, rather than merely produce fluent text, and raises important questions about how current language adaptation pipelines preserve instruction-following and structured reasoning capabilities.
Abstract
We introduce Grounded Multilingual Task Worlds for Romanian (GMTW-Ro), a benchmark designed to evaluate whether large language models can reliably follow complex instructions in Romanian, rather than merely produce fluent text. Existing Romanian benchmarks largely rely on multiple-choice formats, answer extraction, or model-based evaluation, which struggle to assess multi-constraint reasoning and structured task completion. GMTW-Ro addresses these limitations through grounded task worlds: fully specified environments in which model outputs are verified via deterministic, programmatic checks. The benchmark spans four task domains—travel planning, calendar scheduling, context-grounded question answering, and dietary menu planning—requiring both a structured JSON plan and a natural-language explanation in Romanian. Evaluation is decomposed into three orthogonal metrics: Understanding (U), measuring constraint adherence and instruction-following; Generation (G), assessing Romanian text quality through diacritic accuracy, language purity, and code-switching absence; and Faithfulness (F), quantifying consistency between generated plans and their explanations. All instances are automatically verified as solvable using backtracking algorithms. We release two curated datasets: a standard benchmark of 500 instances and an adversarial set of 300 instances with heightened constraint complexity, alongside the complete evaluation toolkit and a purpose-built Romanian NLP library. Evaluation of 11 models reveals substantial performance variation (58.6%–90.7%) and exposes a pronounced knowledge–behavior gap, where models with fluent Romanian generation nevertheless fail core reasoning tasks. Most notably, Romanian-finetuned models underperform their base counterparts: RoLlama3.1-8B scores 20.1 percentage points below Llama-3.1-8B, with structured JSON output success dropping from 95 to 44%. These results raise important questions about how current language adaptation pipelines preserve instruction-following and structured reasoning capabilities.
We present L3Cube-IndicQuest v2, a large-scale gold-standard multilingual question-answering benchmark for evaluating the India-specific factual knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs). The benchmark comprises 3,471 curriculum-grounded English question--answer pairs spanning nine domains, curated from educational curricula, competitive examination materials, and domain-specific reference books. We introduce a practical hybrid construction strategy that combines context-grounded LLM-based question generation and validation with semantic deduplication and human verification, enabling scalable creation of benchmark data while preserving annotation quality. The benchmark is translated into 19 Indic languages, yielding a publicly released multilingual dataset of 69,420 question--answer pairs across 20 languages. We evaluate six LLMs under three protocols: LLM-as-a-judge and two deterministic lexical criteria, exact-substring and word-overlap matching. All three produce almost the same model ranking, showing that the results do not depend on the choice of judge. The frontier commercial model leads by a wide margin, and among open-weight models Gemma4 31B outperforms the Indic-specialised Sarvam 30B in every evaluated Indic language.
Rinit Jain, Tirthraj Mahajan, Advait Joshi et al.· 0 citations
Mathematical reasoning has become a central task for evaluating and tuning reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet existing benchmarks remain heavily biased toward high-resource languages, with English and Chinese dominating both pre-training corpora and evaluation suites. The recently released PolyMath (Wang et al., 2025) dataset represents a significant step forward, yet its coverage is still limited to 18 only high-resource languages. To address this gap, we introduce PluraMath, an extension of PolyMath to 18 additional {underrepresented languages spanning 6 language families -- ranging from mid-resource to extreme low-resource settings. We constructed the dataset through a human-curated pipeline, where native speakers thoroughly validated pre-computed translations. Using PluraMath, we then benchmark 27 reasoning LLMs across four model scales -- small, mid-size, large, and closed-source ensembles -- probing the multilingual mathematical reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art models under diverse linguistic conditions. Our fine-grained analysis confirms a persistent gap in mathematical reasoning performance between high-resource and underrepresented languages, with stronger results largely associated with better instruction-following ability. We fully open-source our dataset, data acquisition pipeline, and evaluation framework, with the goal of lowering the barrier to multilingual benchmark development for underrepresented communities.
Daryna Dementieva, N. Babakov, Kathy Hammerl et al.· 0 citations
Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency. We introduce M-GATE (Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency), a benchmark of linguistic proficiency spanning 30 typologically diverse languages from high- to low-resource. M-GATE comprises three tasks: grammatical error detection on linguist-crafted, adversarially selected sentences that turn on hard, language-specific phenomena; round-trip translation of shared English sources across 29 target languages, scored by a three-provider LLM judge panel validated against professional annotators; and a supplementary tokenizer-efficiency measure. We evaluate over 50 models in more than 80 configurations. Fluency and proficiency come apart sharply: models that translate competently sit near chance on the adversarial grammar items, the best reaching a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of only 0.36, and their errors lean systematically toward under-flagging, accepting ungrammatical text rather than raising false alarms. Translation quality closely tracks a language's share of pretraining data (r = 0.86 against log Common Crawl share), producing a steep low-resource penalty that is nonetheless narrowing with successive model releases. Enabling reasoning reliably improves translation, while its effect on error detection is smaller and for some models negative, so the best configuration is task-dependent. To resist contamination, test items are kept private behind a continuously updated public leaderboard, with illustrative examples released (https://m-gate.ai).
Tomáš Burkert, Angelika Peljak-Łapińska, David Zelený· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in high-resource languages, yet their performance on Traditional Mongolian remains highly limited. A primary bottleneck is the absence of a systematic evaluation framework, which precludes quantitative comparison and obscures directions for model optimization. In this paper, we introduce TM-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark for LLMs on Traditional Mongolian. TM-Bench adopts a hybrid construction strategy consisting of human-verified Translation-based Adaptation, Expert-Original Authoring, and Semi-automated Synthesis. It comprises 18,357 instances spanning five tasks across both natural language understanding and generation to evaluate models' reasoning, knowledge application, and linguistic proficiency. We conduct systematic evaluations across representative model families. The results show that on understanding tasks, model performance lags significantly behind high-resource languages, with only a few models performing slightly above the random baseline. For generation tasks, both automatic metrics and double-blind human evaluations reveal severe semantic collapse, failing to generate coherent text and often producing unreadable gibberish. These findings underscore the critical role of TM-Bench as a foundational infrastructure for evaluating LLMs in Traditional Mongolian and catalyzing future model optimization. Our benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/gao1948083886/TM-Bench.
Zhenjie Gao, Feilong Bao, Aruukhan Bai et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on text-to-knowledge graph generation and related tasks. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether they accurately model the direction-dependent semantics of inverse relations, in which reversing the order of the arguments alters the meaning of a relation (e.g., \textit{mother} versus \textit{child}). To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first systematic study of inverse relation directionality in LLMs, using a benchmark consisting of 5,457 instances spanning 27 distinct inverse relation labels. We evaluate five open-source LLMs under a multiple-choice prompting framework and further examine the influence of relation descriptions and entity representations by substituting the original entities with synthetic and masked entities. Our findings reveal systematic asymmetries in inverse relation classification across LLMs, indicate that relation descriptions do not consistently improve performance, and show that model performance can be sensitive to variations in entity representations.
By evaluating paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer accuracy separately, LitTraceQA provides a testbed for scientific QA systems that produce verifiable answers rather than unsupported summaries.