Tracking Human Daily Cognitive Activity from EEG and Biometric Data
Alina GutorevaZhaniya Omar
Oct 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
Understanding human cognitive activity in everyday life remains challenging due to the dynamic, context-dependent, and multimodal nature of cognition. Laboratory-based studies often fail to capture real-world cognitive processes, while single-modality approaches provide only partial insight into cognitive states. Advances in wearable sensing now enable the collection of heterogeneous data streams for a more comprehensive view of daily cognition. This paper presents a multimodal framework for tracking human cognitive activity using electroencephalography (EEG), wearable physiological signals, behavioral context, and self-reported measures. A preliminary pilot study was conducted with observational data from three participants (N = 3) over 280 annotated 10-minute intervals spanning nine activity domains across two weeks.
Results reveal consistent temporal patterns, including a discernible mid-day decrease in motivation and energy at 13:00, followed by afternoon recovery. Work and IADLs yielded the highest flow state rates (51% and 50%), while ADLs produced the lowest (15%). Motivation correlated strongly with arousal (r = 0.78) and attention (r = 0.74), whereas perceived stress showed a weaker negative relationship (r = -0.33). A linear regression model predicting motivation from arousal, attention, energy, and stress achieved R2 = 0.76 (MAE = 9.84, RMSE = 12.85). Lag-based analysis indicates that prior energy levels positively predict subsequent motivation, confirming temporal dependencies in cognitive dynamics.
These findings demonstrate the feasibility of multimodal cognitive activity analysis in real-world environments and highlight the importance of integrating physiological and behavioral indicators. The proposed framework provides a foundation for future large-scale multimodal systems and applied intelligent solutions.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.