Skip to content
Open access

Double stimulation in the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim): a comparative evaluation of follicular and luteal phase response

Sep 2026 · Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association · Vol 27, pp. 196 - 202 · 0 citations · 26 references
Medicine

TL;DR

DuoStim is supported as an effective strategy to maximize oocyte yield within a single menstrual cycle in this challenging population and further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate cumulative reproductive outcomes.

Abstract

Objective Double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim) protocols, in which both follicular and luteal phase stimulations are performed within the same menstrual cycle, have emerged as a promising strategy for patients with diminished ovarian reserve. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of follicular and luteal phase stimulations in patients undergoing DuoStim protocols. Material and Methods This retrospective intra-patient paired comparative study included patients who underwent DuoStim between January 2018 and December 2024 at a university-based infertility clinic. Stimulation protocols, gonadotropin doses and trigger types were evaluated. Primary outcomes were retrieved oocyte and metaphase II (MII) oocyte numbers across both stimulation phases. Clinical pregnancy rates achieved by embryos derived separately from each stimulation phase were evaluated as a secondary outcome. Duration of stimulation, total gonadotropin doses administered, cumulative oocyte yield and embryos obtained, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and live birth rates were also assessed. Results The study included 120 patients. Retrieved oocytes numbers [2 (1-3) and 2 (1-5) in follicular phase and luteal phase], MII oocytes [1 (1-2) and 2 (0-4)], and frozen cleavage stage embryos [1 (0-1) and 1 (0-2) in follicular phase and luteal phase] were higher in the luteal phase stimulation (p<0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.005 respectively). Oocyte yield, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two phases. Total gonadotropin doses and stimulation duration were significantly higher during follicular phase stimulation. Conclusion In patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing DuoStim, luteal phase stimulation yielded significantly more retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes despite requiring lower gonadotropin doses and shorter stimulation duration. Fertilization rates, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy rates were comparable between phases, suggesting that luteal phase-derived embryos are equally competent. These findings support DuoStim as an effective strategy to maximize oocyte yield within a single menstrual cycle in this challenging population. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate cumulative reproductive outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

2026

Gestagens as an alternative to GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation protocols in oocyte donors and cancer patients

The use of dydrogesterone and cetrorelix to prevent sudden LH surges demonstrated comparable outcomes in oocyte donors participating in IVF-DO programs and in patients with neoplastic diseases undergoing fertility preservation programs.

K. Isakova, K. V. Krasnopolskaya, A. Parokonnaya et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Ovarian responsiveness during random-start stimulation and DuoStim in women: comparative insights from domestic animal models

In women, recognition of sequential follicular waves throughout the menstrual cycle established the physiologic basis for random-start ovarian stimulation outside the conventional early follicular phase and for DuoStim within a single cycle. These approaches reduce treatment delays and, in the case of DuoStim, provide...

Don R. Bergfelt · 0 citations
Open access Jan 2026

Effectiveness of a low-dose gonadotropin protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation at a University Assisted Reproduction Center.

OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the effectiveness of a low-dose gonadotropin protocol for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for patients with a good prognosis attending a public health university care center. STUDY DESIGN A randomized, non-inferiority, single-blind clinical trial. Th...

M. Nakano, E. Baracat, J. Soares et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Ovulation induction versus artificial cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE We aim to clarify the comparative clinical efficacy of ovulation induction and artificial cycle (AC) protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in reproductive-aged women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), given the conflicting findings and ongoing controversy surrounding this issue in existing stu...

Ya-Nan Liu, Xi-Tong Liu, Yu Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Role of Clomiphene Citrate in Gonadotropin Stimulation Protocols in Poor Responders: A Mini-Review of Recent Clinical Evidence

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and poor ovarian response (POR) remain among the most challenging conditions in assisted reproductive technology, and no optimal stimulation strategy has been established. Clomiphene citrate (CC), a selective estrogen receptor modulator that augments endogenous gonadotropin secretion an...

Maria T. Papadopoulou, Miltiadis Badagionis, Fotios Vlahos et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Embryo Ploidy and Ovarian Response in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Versus Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocols with Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone: A Within-Patient Study

OBJECTIVE: To compare embryo ploidy rates and ovarian response outcomes between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) cycles with recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) administered from stimulation onset. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective within-patient cohort s...

Merve Dizdar, F. K. Boynukalin, B. Dundar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.