Skip to content
Open access

Adapting Ephemeral ECC Authentication for Decentralized Web 3.0: A Threat Model and Security Analysis

2026 · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · 0 citations · 54 references

Abstract

Web 3.0 shifts control of digital identity and data away from centralized platforms, moving authentication onto resource-constrained end-user devices, wallets, and smart contracts. RSA and ElGamal are computationally expensive at the key sizes required for adequate security, making them a poor match for this setting. This study presents a user-centric Web 3.0 authentication framework combining Elliptic Curve Cryptography with an ephemeral Elliptic Curve ElGamal (ECEG) character-encoding scheme, building on an ephemeral-encoding design for constrained IoT devices and its subsequent hash/XOR authentication extension. Unlike that prior design, the mutual-authentication step here binds each party to its long-term key through digital signatures and replaces static-key ECEG transport with a two-ephemeral-key ECEG transport, providing an erasure-conditional forward-secrecy property that the prior design lacks. We define a Dolev-Yao threat model with an in-scope/out-of-scope adversary boundary, an assumption-based security analysis, a formal-verification specification, and a decentralized-identifier/verifiable-credential mechanism binding long-term public keys to claimed identities, addressing the identity-binding gap that otherwise limits man-in-the-middle resistance without a common certificate authority. A protocol-level operation count and a complexity comparison against RSA are reported without claiming empirical superiority. We situate the framework against its closest prior IoT-oriented work and active 2025–2026 literature on ECC- and blockchain-based decentralized authentication. Recent 2026 analyses have reduced estimates of the quantum resources needed to solve the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem underlying secp256k1-style curves; we give a post-quantum outlook against current NIST migration guidance. The evaluation remains analytical rather than empirical; formal verification and hardware benchmarking remain necessary before production deployment.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.