It is argued that domain specific evaluation of this kind is a necessary precondition for responsible deployment of generative AI in non safety critical aviation operations.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for aviation business operations, from documentation and training generation to customer facing assistants. General purpose benchmarks do not measure whether a model reasons safely and correctly about aviation specific operational knowledge, and the high stakes, regulated nature of the domain makes that gap consequential. We present Pre-Flight, an open source benchmark of 300 multiple choice questions drawn from international standards and airport ground operations material, covering international airport ground operations, ICAO and US FAA regulations, aviation general knowledge and complex operational scenarios. Questions were authored and reviewed by practitioners with experience in air traffic management, ground operations and commercial flying. We evaluate a range of contemporary commercial and open weight models using the Inspect evaluation framework, scoring by accuracy under a standard multiple choice protocol, and we maintain the leaderboard on a rolling basis as new models are released. Against an informal expert reference of around 95%, obtained from a low sample quiz of aviation professionals at a conference, even the strongest model evaluated (released in 2026) reaches 82.7%, having improved only gradually from roughly 75% in early 2025. A substantial and persistent gap below expert level reliability therefore remains. We release the dataset, the evaluation harness and the results, and the benchmark is available within the community evaluations package distributed with inspect_evals. We argue that domain specific evaluation of this kind is a necessary precondition for responsible deployment of generative AI in non safety critical aviation operations.
A safety-gated evaluation framework in which a trajectory succeeds only when all task goals are achieved without violating any hard safety constraint, while safe goal progress and trajectory safety are measured separately is established.
Yu-Chen Yuan, Zheng-Huang Wu, Yuan-Gan Li et al.· 0 citations
This study aims to construct and validate a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-driven workflow for automatically generating SJT items and provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of an automated development pathway for psychological assessment tools based on LLMs and RAG technology.
Yaqian Liu, Qida Hao, Jian Cheng et al.· AHFE International· 0 citations
This work presents an AI-assisted approach that generates candidate hazard scenarios from NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), and proposes a hybrid variant, conditioning narrative generation on a structured hypothesis produced via evolutionary abduction, improving correctness and reducing variability.
Cristian Mascia, R. Pietrantuono, Daniel Rodríguez et al.· 0 citations
This article experimentally evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) can generate operationally realistic ATC transmissions and outlines a concrete path and its current limits toward LLM-assisted ATC.
Mahyar Ghazanfari, Matthias Casanova, J. Kam et al.· 1 citation
A multi-agent, persona-driven prompt generation algorithm generates realistic, multilingual prompts with minimal human review, leaving room for improvement with modern jail breaking techniques in AIR-BENCH Live, a self-evolving successor to AIR-BENCH 2024.
EVA-Bench is presented, a benchmark designed to evaluate foundation model capabilities for exploration EVA (xEVA) support under operationally grounded and safety-relevant conditions and helps identify which models are most suitable for later integration into EVA decision-support systems.
Kaisheng Li, R. Whittle· 55th International Conferenc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.