It is concluded that academic integrity cannot be reduced to rule compliance or technological surveillance, but must be understood as a constitutive dimension of educational experience, linked to intellectual honesty, responsibility, and critical formation.
Abstract
The expansion of generative artificial intelligence in higher education has reshaped writing, reading, research, and assessment practices, bringing classical issues of academic integrity back to the center of debate, such as plagiarism, authorship, authenticity, and intellectual responsibility. This article critically analyzes recent literature on the relationship between generative AI and academic integrity, based on a qualitative and interpretive scoping review. The study brings together contributions from critical pedagogy, technology ethics, and algorithmic culture studies, situating the discussion within the broader context of higher education platformization and the intensification of digital surveillance. The findings indicate three central axes: the transformation of notions of authorship and originality; the prevalence of institutional responses focused on control, detection, and sanction; and the emergence of pedagogical proposals that treat AI as an opportunity to rethink assignments, assessment, and formative processes. The article concludes that academic integrity cannot be reduced to rule compliance or technological surveillance, but must be understood as a constitutive dimension of educational experience, linked to intellectual honesty, responsibility, and critical formation.
It is argued that the leadership of digital education should move beyond broad AI policies toward context-sensitive guidance, verification literacy, transparent disclosure norms, and process-based assessment, including the culminating site of doctoral assessment, the dissertation defense.
It is argued that AI-related integrity disputes are better understood as conflicts between competing values than as individual moral failings, and implications for policy design, assessment reform, and faculty development are discussed.
M. Grobler· Proceedings of the Internati...· 0 citations
Empirical evidence is contributed from educational action research showing that structured pedagogical interventions can promote the critical, ethical, and responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in education.
Rodrigo Florêncio da Silva· Information· 1 citation
It is concluded that in order for undergraduate education to continue to be relevant in a society where AI is pervasive, governance must change toward process-oriented evaluation and relational originality.
Joe Mutebi, Brian Mugisha, Ibrahim Adabara et al.· F1000Research· 0 citations
This study re-examines the theological concept of the Imago Dei (Image of God), particularly its biblical grounding in Genesis 1:26–27, as an interpretive framework for understanding these transformations. The study employs a qualitative, interpretive, literature-based methodology that brings theological anthropology into conversation with philosophy of technology and contemporary higher education scholarship. Sources were identified through a structured search and selection process, examined against explicit relevance criteria, and synthesised through thematic analysis. Four themes emerged from the interdisciplinary literature: human agency and dignity, cognitive formation and externalisation, digitally mediated identity and authorship, and ethical-relational formation. The findings indicate that AI can augment learning and creativity but may also encourage cognitive dependence, blur conventional understandings of authorship, and intensify the tendency to evaluate students through measurable digital outputs. Contemporary higher education scholarship similarly emphasises the importance of human agency, critical engagement, ethical governance, and responsible AI literacy. The study argues that the Imago Dei provides a constructive theological framework to ensure that AI remains a means of supporting, rather than replacing, human intellectual, moral, relational, and spiritual formation. The paper proposes a human-centred model of AI integration in higher education grounded in dignity, agency, discernment, relationality, and holistic formation.
Abigail Kerubo Osoro· Journal of Philosophy and Re...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.