Skip to content
Open access

Development of an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Academic Integrity, Inclusive Learning, and Quality Assurance in Digital Higher Education

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence · Vol 1, pp. 59-80 · 0 citations · 19 references

TL;DR

The developed XAI framework provides a transparent, ethical, and scalable solution for improving academic integrity, promoting inclusive learning, and strengthening quality assurance in digital higher education.

Abstract

Abstract: The rapid adoption of digital higher education has transformed teaching, learning, and assessment by increasing accessibility and flexibility. However, it has also introduced challenges related to academic integrity, equitable access to learning opportunities, and effective quality assurance. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to address these challenges, many existing AI systems lack transparency, limiting stakeholder trust and accountability. This study aimed to develop and validate an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework that enhances academic integrity, supports inclusive learning, and strengthens quality assurance in digital higher education through transparent and interpretable AI-driven decision-making. A convergent mixed-methods research design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 12,500 learner records, online assessment logs, learning management system interactions, and institutional quality assurance indicators from multiple higher education institutions. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions involving students, instructors, instructional designers, and quality assurance experts. Explainable machine learning algorithms and fairness assessment techniques were integrated into the proposed framework to detect academic misconduct, identify at-risk learners, evaluate educational quality, and generate interpretable recommendations. The proposed framework achieved an accuracy of 95.1%, precision of 94.3%, recall of 93.8%, an F1-score of 94.0%, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, while reducing false-positive academic misconduct alerts by 27% compared with conventional AI models. Qualitative findings demonstrated that explainable AI significantly improved stakeholder trust, perceived fairness, transparency, and confidence in AI-supported educational decision-making. The developed XAI framework provides a transparent, ethical, and scalable solution for improving academic integrity, promoting inclusive learning, and strengthening quality assurance in digital higher education. The framework contributes to trustworthy AI adoption and supports evidence-based institutional decision-making, thereby advancing sustainable digital transformation in higher education. Keywords: Academic Integrity; Inclusive Learning; Quality Assurance; Digital Higher Education.; Keywords:Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Responsible use of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assurance for Education: Opportunities and Challenges

It is concluded that academic institutions must use clear ethical practices and AI-aware assessment designs to ensure that technology is used as an assisting tool that improves users' learning while ensuring the fundamental values of education.

Sugandha Nandedkar, Prachi N. Waghmare, Ashwini Swami et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Synthesis of Student Learning, Assessment Transformation, and Academic Integrity

The review concludes that artificial intelligence should be treated as a socio-technical component of curriculum and assessment rather than a stand-alone productivity tool, because its educational legitimacy depends on whether institutions can preserve epistemic agency, valid judgement of learning, equitable access, and accountable human responsibility.

A. Talib · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Educational Transformation, Assessment, and Governance

It is shown that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance, and that successful GenAI integration requires a balanced approach combining technological capability, pedagogical redesign, and responsible governance.

Syusinka Rahmatika, Martanto, Ryan Hamonangan · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Does artificial intelligence enhance or undermine teaching and learning in higher education?

The review concludes that responsible integration, supported by strong governance frameworks, drives the impact of AI in academia and recommends introducing clear institutional policies for the use of AI in higher education, promoting equitable access to digital infrastructure, and mandating transparency and accountability to ensure trust and fairness in high-stakes decision-making.

S. Mpanza · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

The Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Review of Pedagogical Innovation, Ethical Challenges, and Future Governance

Artificial Intelligence should be positioned as a complementary educational resource rather than a replacement for human expertise to ensure inclusive and meaningful educational transformation.

Therese Kabala - Mwagalwa · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.