This is the first study to benchmark SLMs on Italian EHRs and investigate the role of clinical expertise in prompt engineering, offering valuable insights for the future integration of SLMs into real-world clinical workflows.
Abstract
Background
Real-world data (RWD) in unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) is crucial for understanding complex diseases like cancer, but extracting structured information is challenging due to linguistic variability, semantic complexity, and privacy concerns. This study evaluates the performance of four small, locally deployable language models for information extraction from Italian EHRs.
Methods
We examine three prompting strategies (zero-shot, few-shot, and annotated few-shot) across English and Italian, involving clinicians with varying expertise to assess the impact of prompt design on accuracy. We evaluate the performance of four open-source small language models (SLMs) for clinical information extraction from Italian electronic health records (EHRs) in the APOLLO 11 trial on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The extraction protocol involves four steps: problem definition, data preprocessing, Large Language Model (LLM)-based information extraction, and output evaluation.
Results
We show that general-purpose models (e.g., LLaMA 3.1 8B) outperform biomedical models in most tasks, particularly in extracting binary features. Multiclass variables such as TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) staging, PD-L1 (Programmed death-ligand 1), and ECOG-PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status) are more difficult due to implicit language and lack of standardization. Few-shot prompting and native-language inputs significantly improve performance and reduced hallucinations. Clinical expertise enhances consistency in the extraction, particularly among students using annotated examples.
Conclusions
The study confirms that privacy-preserving SLMs can be deployed locally for efficient and secure cancer data extraction. Findings highlight the need for hybrid systems combining SLMs with expert input and underline the importance of aligning clinical documentation practices with SLM capabilities. This is the first study to benchmark SLMs on Italian EHRs and investigate the role of clinical expertise in prompt engineering, offering valuable insights for the future integration of SLMs into real-world clinical workflows.
This study evaluated both closed-source and open-source large language models for extracting and prioritizing medical jargon from EHR notes relevant to individual patients, leveraging prompting techniques, fine-tuning, and data augmentation and found that model performance could deviate largely based on prompting styles.
W. Jang, Sharmin Sultana, Zonghai Yao et al.· JMIR AI· 1 citation
Overall, the evidence suggests that success in lower capability levels does not consistently translate to higher-level reasoning, especially when reports are inconsistent, required staging inputs are missing, or clinical assumptions must be inferred, which helps explain gaps between benchmark results and practical adoption.
Maryam Seifaddini, Mohammad Beheshti, Steven Richberg et al.· Modern Pathology· 0 citations
Open LLMs can extract clinical findings from Finnish pediatric records with accuracy comparable to published English benchmarks, and uncertainty-based triage substantially reduces required expert workload.
J. Leinonen, J. Knuutila, S. Kurki et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
The findings support the feasibility of applying LLM-based natural language processing tools in resource-limited, non-English healthcare settings and should assess emerging high-parameter models and explore additional clinical domains.
Breno Gabriel Araújo Sampaio de Jesus, Tomaz Castrillon Figueiredo, Clariele de Almeida Pereira et al.· Cadernos de Saúde Pública· 1 citation
CTcue performance for patient selection was lower than anticipated, however, it enables accurate, efficient extraction of structured and unstructured EHR data in early-stage NSCLC.
Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Tobias Martinot, Lydia H N Schonewille et al.· JCO Clinical Cancer Informat...· 0 citations
Current LLMs do not achieve inter-rater reliability levels comparable to medical professionals in clinical information extraction from ENT documentation, suggesting they are best suited for initial extraction with human verification rather than autonomous operation.
L. Barrett, N. Joshi, A. S. North et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.