Skip to content
Review Open access

Content, Consumer, Corrections: A Neurocognitive Model of Misinformation Processing

2026 · Психология Журнал Высшей школы экономики · 0 citations

TL;DR

A neurocognitive model is proposed that synthesizes behavioral and neuroimaging findings within a unified framework that generates testable neuroimaging predictions and points toward neuroscience-informed strategies for countering misinformation.

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of misinformation in digital environments poses a serious threat to public health, political institutions, and public discourse. Behavioral research has accumulated substantial evidence on why people believe and share false information, yet individual studies address cognitive biases, social factors, or emotional processes largely in isolation. Additionally, the influential integrative frameworks that do exist operate exclusively at the behavioral level, overlooking the neurophysiological mechanisms of misinformation processing. This work addresses that gap by proposing a neurocognitive model that synthesizes behavioral and neuroimaging findings within a unified framework. Following an integrative review methodology, we organize the literature around three domains: message characteristics (Content: emotionality, novelty, repetition), individual consumer traits (Consumer: analytical thinking, need for cognition, working memory, conformity, emotional state, and prior beliefs), and corrective interventions (Corrections: reactive debunking and pre-emptive prebunking, inoculation, and warnings). For each domain, principal behavioral factors are mapped onto their fMRI and EEG/MEG/ERP correlates. Crossdomain analysis reveals that these behaviorally distinct phenomena rely on a shared neural infrastructure of four functional hubs, each performing a core computational operation: conflict detection (anterior cingulate cortex), belief valuation (ventromedial prefrontal cortex), memory encoding and persistence (hippocampal–amygdala circuit), and executive control (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus). Framed as a mechanism sketch, the model generates testable neuroimaging predictions and points toward neuroscience-informed strategies for countering misinformation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

The Neurotypical Assumption in Consumer Research: Rethinking Consumer Heterogeneity Through Neurocognitive Diversity

Understanding why individuals perceive, interpret, and respond differently to the same environmental stimuli represents one of the central questions in the behavioral sciences. Across the psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience, and behavioral decision research, substantial effort has been devoted to explaining the...

Polona Dakič, A. Faganel · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Consensus, Disagreements, and Open Questions in the Psychology of Misinformation.

Research on misinformation has expanded rapidly over the past decade. This review examines areas of consensus and contention within the literature on misinformation, with particular attention to conceptual definitions, measurement approaches, and theoretical explanations. We outline views on what it means to be suscept...

Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Cognitive load and individual differences as drivers of health-related misinformation: A signal detection approach

The global spread of health-related misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to understand the psychological mechanisms that make individuals susceptible to health-related misinformation. This study examined the impact of cognitive load and individual differences on susceptibility to COVID-1...

Guillermo Puebla, Rodrigo Ferrer-Urbina, D. Perez-Zapata et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Many labels, shared threat processes: classifying domain-labelled anxieties by mechanism rather than context

Abstract Psychology has accumulated numerous ‘X-anxieties’—math, test, foreign-language, public-speaking, driving, health, and others—each with its own scale and specialist literature. Yet these experiences often share a phenomenological core of anticipatory worry, bodily arousal, catastrophic simulation, and avoidance...

Peng Wang, Li-Ye Zou, Fred Paas et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Popcorn Brain in the Digital Age: A Critical Mini-Review of Attention, Cognitive Control, Reward Processing, and Digital Overload

It is argued that the scientific value of the popcorn-brain metaphor lies not in treating it as a disorder, but in using it to organize testable questions about fragmented attention, reward expectancy, cognitive offloading, and self-regulation.

Priyaranjan Maral, P. Pandey · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.