Skip to content
Review Open access

Data governance transparency and psychological wellbeing in digital platforms: the roles of trust and emotional regulation

Sep 2026 · Frontiers in Psychology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 40 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Perceived data governance transparency may support platform-related psychological wellbeing through an organized process involving trust and emotional regulation, although its benefits are weaker among users with stronger privacy concern.

Abstract

Introduction Digital platforms increasingly govern users through data collection, inference, sharing, retention, and accountability arrangements, but the psychological consequences of perceived data governance transparency remain underexamined. This study tested whether perceived transparency is associated with platform-related psychological wellbeing through trust and context-specific emotional regulation, and whether privacy concern weakens this relationship. Methods Study 1 surveyed 612 adult digital platform users recruited through a professional online panel in mainland China. Confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, bias-corrected bootstrap mediation with 5,000 resamples, common-method diagnostics, and moderation analysis were conducted. Study 2 used between-subjects scenario experiment with 286 participants assigned to high- or low-transparency descriptions of a fictitious platform. Group comparisons and bootstrap conditional process analyses tested the proposed mechanism. Results In Study 1, perceived transparency was positively associated with wellbeing (beta = 0.17, p < 0.01), trust (beta = 0.59, p < 0.001), and emotional regulation (beta = 0.16, p < 0.01). Trust and emotional regulation showed significant separate indirect effects, and the sequential indirect effect was 0.077 (95% CI [0.049, 0.113]). Privacy concern weakened the direct transparency-wellbeing association (interaction beta = −0.08, p = 0.018). In Study 2, the high-transparency condition produced higher trust (d = 0.84), emotional regulation (d = 0.51), and wellbeing (d = 0.64); the sequential indirect effect was 0.072 (95% CI [0.036, 0.122]). Discussion Perceived data governance transparency may support platform-related psychological wellbeing through an organized process involving trust and emotional regulation, although its benefits are weaker among users with stronger privacy concern. The experimental findings are limited to structured vs. vague policy-text cues and should not be generalized to the full ecology of real-world platform governance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Social protection data governance and public trust: the mediating role of targeting fairness among generation z

Digital social protection increasingly depends on integrated administrative data, making data governance, targeting fairness, and public trust closely connected. This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study examined whether perceived targeting fairness mediates the association between social protection data governan...

Bambang Arwanto · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Data Privacy Concerns and Consumer Engagement with AI-Enabled Global Digital Platforms in Bangladesh: The Mediating Role of Perceived Trust

This study examines how data privacy concerns shape consumer engagement with AI-enabled global digital platforms in Bangladesh and tests perceived trust as an intervening mechanism. The study responds to the rapid normalization of data-intensive platform services in an emerging digital economy, where privacy concern, t...

Jannat Mst. Tahsina, Juthy Atifa Akter, Akter Sraboni et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Transparency, trust and happiness in chatbot adoption: a multigender analysis from the digital service innovation perspective

This study examines how technological transparency influences trust, happiness and the intention to use chatbots in digital service environments, integrating perspectives from digital service innovation (DSI) and service-dominant logic (SDL). It additionally analyses gender-based differences to understand perceptua...

Mario-Alberto Salazar-Altamirano, Orlando Josué Martínez-Arvizu, Araceli Galiano-Coronil et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Transparency: How Institutional Credibility Mediates Digital Transparency and Financial Reporting Quality Effects on Muzakki Trust?

Although Indonesia has enormous zakat potential, the amount collected through formal zakat institutions remains considerably below its estimated capacity, indicating continuing challenges in strengthening muzakki trust. This study investigates the effects of digital transparency and financial reporting quality on muzak...

N. Hidayah, Muhammad Rifaldi Djufri, Praja Hadi Saputra · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

AI transparency and bias mitigation in customer service: how ethical culture shapes customer trust

AI transparency and bias mitigation are reframed as governance and organizational control mechanisms, rather than mere technical features, which demonstrates that organizational ethical culture acts as a key informal context, shaping whether customers view these mechanisms as credible signals of fairness and accountabi...

M. Ehsan, Abid Hussain, Jing Song et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.