Sep 2026· Science Bulletin· Vol 16, pp. 200-210· 0 citations
Abstract
This article analyzes the theoretical-conceptual foundations of the collectivism–individualism
cultural dimension and its mechanisms of influence on economic development within the framework
of contemporary social sciences. The study demonstrates that collectivism and individualism should
be understood not merely as opposing value orientations, but also as multidimensional and dynamic
cultural systems shaping psychological self-construals, behavioral patterns, social interactions, and
mechanisms of institutional coordination. By systematizing classical and contemporary theoretical
approaches, the article argues that collectivism–individualism should be interpreted not as a static
binary model, but as an adaptive cultural structure transformed in response to changing socioeconomic conditions. It is further shown that the influence of this cultural dimension on economic
development is realized indirectly through institutional quality, innovation, entrepreneurship, risk
behavior, family structures, social capital, and trust relations, thereby shaping different models of
economic coordination and long-term development trajectories. The scientific novelty of the article
lies in conceptualizing collectivism–individualism as a multilevel and transformable cultural
mechanism linking micro-level individual behavior with macro-level institutional and economic
processes, as well as in presenting a dynamic analytical approach integrating psychological,
institutional, and socio-economic mechanisms within a unified theoretical framework.
Abstract
Economic insecurity has become a defining feature of political life in many
transitional democracies, yet its relationship with institutional trust remains
insufficiently explained. Existing scholarships often assume a direct link between
economic performance and political legitimacy, treating trust as a ratio...
Research on strategic culture has generated rich case studies of continuity and change, yet explanations of strategic cultural change remain undertheorised. Existing accounts often privilege crises and shocks as primary triggers, while offering limited theoretical insight into the interaction among drivers, the agents...
Ying-Jian Li, Christoph O. Meyer· Cooperation and Conflict· 0 citations
The article argues that contemporary debates on socialist planning can only contribute to the revolutionary transformation of capitalist society if re-anchored in the unified economic and political analysis of Marx, Engels, and Lenin. Although their remarks on planning were scattered, they consistently reflected both t...
Christos Balomenos· World Review of Political Ec...· 0 citations
This article develops the concept of structural cynicism to explain transformations in trust, legitimacy, and public communication in late‐modern societies. Existing sociological approaches generally conceptualize cynicism as an individual attitude, a moral disposition, or a reaction to institutional failure. In cont...
Kire Sharlamanov· Sociological forum (Randolph...· 0 citations
Culture occupies a paradoxical position within the social sciences: it is simultaneously among the most frequently invoked constructs in scholarly and popular discourse and among the most persistently contested in its definition, boundaries and methods of study. This paper attempts to offer a synthesis of culture as an...
Vedant Pandya· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The individualism-collectivism (I-C) construct has been widely used to explain cross-cultural variation in anti-social behavior (ASB), yet its application in criminology remains conceptually and methodologically underdeveloped. This study is a scoping review of 31 empirical studies to examine how I-C has been operation...
Masahiro Suzuki· International journal of off...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.