Oct 2026· Proceeding of The International Seminar on Business, Economics, Social Science and Technology (ISBEST)· 0 citations· 12 references
Abstract
Global economic uncertainty and the climate crisis demand fundamental transformations across various sectors, including the creative industry. Conventional commercial photography and visual communication design production often generate a substantial carbon footprint through material waste, excessive energy consumption, and high logistical mobility. This paper explores the integration of circular economy principles and digital transformation within visual production workflows as a strategic response to these sustainability challenges. This research aims to analyze how the adoption of disruptive technologies - such as generative artificial intelligence, virtual production, and cloud computing - can reduce carbon emissions while simultaneously enhancing operational cost efficiency. The methodology employs a systematic literature review alongside qualitative case studies of creative agencies that have implemented sustainable workflows. Findings indicate that the digitalization of creative processes effectively eliminates physical waste, notably excessive sample printing and single-use practical set constructions. Furthermore, the transition toward a virtual production ecosystem is proven to drastically minimize logistical expenses, thereby bolstering the financial resilience of industry practitioners amidst a fragmented global economy. Leveraging cutting-edge technology also substantially accelerates project turnaround times without compromising aesthetic design quality. In conclusion, the adoption of digital technologies is not merely a fleeting aesthetic trend but an essential catalyst for establishing a circular and inclusive creative economy. This innovative transformation empowers visual communication designers and professional photographers to remain productive, relevant, and highly competitive globally. Ultimately, these crucial economic milestones can be achieved while practitioners uphold strong ethical responsibilities toward ecological preservation and the development of future-proof business models.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.