ExRole is introduced, a trajectory-to-role framework that learns future-aware role prototypes from prefix-local team traces, resolves them into readable instructions and token-aligned role markers, and optionally routes shared LoRA rank slots with turn-aligned credit.
Abstract
Roles provide an interpretable interface for organizing language-model agents, yet most multi-agent systems treat them as hand-written prompt labels disconnected from learned behavior and parameter updates. We argue that a useful role should instead be an executable control variable: it should summarize behavior predictive of future utility, guide subsequent interaction, and identify the trainable capacity responsible for that behavior. We introduce ExRole, a trajectory-to-role framework that learns future-aware role prototypes from prefix-local team traces, resolves them into readable instructions and token-aligned role markers, and optionally routes shared LoRA rank slots with turn-aligned credit. Across MuSiQue and 2WikiMultiHopQA, ExRole improves over single-agent search by 15.0/14.4 and 13.5/16.1 EM/F1 points, respectively. Against the strongest non-ExRole controls, the corresponding gains remain 11.5/11.6 and 7.7/9.7 points. Across both benchmarks, the controlled results consistently favor trajectory-induced role conditioning over role-free, manual, random, and shuffled alternatives. Role-Agent-Turn interventions further show that the induced roles capture transferable behavioral specialization beyond fixed agent identities or turn positions.
It is demonstrated that communication format and implementation details determine outcomes more than architectural complexity, and that simpler approaches match or outperform multi-agent pipelines for local 7B model deployment.
Ashish Prajapati, Om Mohite· arXiv.org· 0 citations
LLMs are increasingly deployed as orchestrators that coordinate specialized subagents to solve complex tasks through natural language. However, in many important domains like game playing and robotics, the strongest available agents are not language models. Integrating non-language agents with LLMs would require \emph{verbalization}: compressing their rich continuous representations into sparse textual summaries at each interaction step. To study whether verbalization constitutes a bottleneck, we introduce \textsc{LLAMIA-Bench}, a suite of six diverse collaborative chess tasks spanning three facets: behavioral imitation, state assessment, and natural-language explanation. Each task instantiates a well-established chess problem that neither the LLM nor the chess engine can solve alone. To solve LLM collaboration with non-language agents, we introduce \emph{latent state internalization}, which projects the subagent's continuous representations directly into the LLM's token stream as learned state tokens, with dynamic re-encoding as actions advance the environment state. Comparing internalization to verbalized integration, our experiments reveal a consistent \emph{verbalization debt}: the performance gap widens throughout training and persists as the LLM scales from 4B to 14B parameters. A single 14B model, \textsc{LLAMIA}, trained with latent state internalization, matches or exceeds task specialists and frontier models including GPT-5.1 with tool access across all benchmark tasks, and generalizes out-of-distribution where task-specific finetunes collapse
To test whether the taxonomy supports mitigation, TART, Taxonomy-Guided Actionable Representation, is introduced that makes the taxonomy's key aspects explicit to the planner and downstream sub-agents and consistently improves performance.
Vikas Pahuja, J. Brokman, O. Hofman et al.· 0 citations
Specializing Large Language Models (LLMs) toward distinct abilities underpins successes ranging from personalized assistants to multi-agent systems (MAS). Single-agent paradigms rely on pre-defined personas or steering vectors to induce specialization, yet they impose a single fixed specialization that fails to adapt to diverse queries. Conversely, MAS achieves dynamic multi-perspective problem solving by orchestrating agents with distinct text-based roles, but fusing these specializations requires multi-turn interactions that inflate context length and inference cost. To address these limitations, we propose Mixture of Roles (MoRe), which adaptively composes multiple specializations into a single steering vector for single-turn inference. Specifically, MoRe learns a diversified codeboox of steering vectors, each of which encodes a latent role. A query-aware router dynamically fuses the codebook into a steering vector that encompasses multiple roles. By steering the backbone LLM with the composed vector, MoRe enables multi-perspective specialization in a single-agent, single-turn inference process. The proposed MoRe can be efficiently trained via a three-stage SFT curriculum and GRPO post-training, while the backbone LLM remains frozen. Experiments across reasoning and personality benchmarks show that MoRe outperforms single-agent baselines by 2.2% on average, and achieves performance on par with MAS while reducing token cost by 20x.
Zhichen Zeng, Huiyuan Chen, Jingru Cheng et al.· 0 citations
Low-friction, expressive membrane prevents harness failures from becoming model failures and pushes measurement toward the model's true maximal underlying capability, on Factorio, where refinement allows for continuous technology progression and dedicated subagents enable parallelized work.
Seth Karten, Alex L. Zhang, Kevin Thomas et al.· 2 citations· ⚡1
Results show that EMAS can turn experience from new samples into reusable updates to MAS topology and prompts, and is best or tied in six of eight model--benchmark settings.
Chao Fei, Qingyi Si, Kaihua Liang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
