A system in which AI functions as a scaffolded learning partner designed to promote articulation, reflection, and independent reasoning, rather than as an answer-generating tool is proposed.
Abstract
This paper presents a structured approach to integrating AI tutors into undergraduate computer architecture courses at a medium-sized Hispanic-Serving Institution. We propose a system in which AI functions as a scaffolded learning partner designed to promote articulation, reflection, and independent reasoning, rather than as an answer-generating tool. The approach relies on instructor-authored system prompts and controlled interaction patterns to regulate AI behavior, grounded in Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and implemented through the ADDIE instructional design framework. An assessment structured using an AI-driven pair programming protocol was deployed across multiple course sections, with evaluation based on attitudinal survey data analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. Results indicate that students increasingly perceived the AI tutor as supporting critical thinking, problem solving, and effective feedback over time. While participation attrition limits causal claims, the findings suggest that pedagogically grounded, instructor-mediated AI integration can enhance student engagement while mitigating risks associated with unstructured AI use in engineering education.
Developing problem-solving competency is a central goal of undergraduate chemistry education, yet many students struggle to engage productively with complex, multistep problems. At the same time, the rapid adoption of large language model (LLM)–based tools by students in STEM courses raises concerns about over-reliance...
Karen D. Wang, J. Arens, Chi-Wen Yu et al.· Journal of Chemical Educatio...· 0 citations
Remote laboratory environments are increasingly central to distance and online STEM education, yet students often lack access to immediate, situated tutor support during live experimental activity. This paper presents OELAssist, an AI-driven adaptive support system designed to provide real-time, context-aware feedback...
D. Kbaier, Andrew J. Mason· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
This study investigates how a structured “paper-first” approach can support cognitive engagement during artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted academic work in higher education. Growing reliance on generative AI has increased concerns about surface-level learning, trial-and-error prompting, and reduced student ownership...
G. W. Collins· Contemporary Educational Tec...· 0 citations
How students interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems in educational settings may determine whether that interaction supports or displaces critical thinking. This paper introduces two contributions. The first is the Three Paths of Student-AI Interaction, a typological framework identifying three qualitatively...
Working adult learners in online graduate programs face challenges that make strict AI bans both impractical and unhelpful. This paper introduces the Thinking Partner Framework, a practical approach to AI integration developed and refined across six semesters of graduate research methods courses serving approximately 4...
Abbot L. Packard, R. Fuller, Glen A. Holmes et al.· Online Journal of Distance L...· 0 citations
Instructors looking to support personalized mathematics learning may provide access to generative AI tutoring tools. Few studies explore the effectiveness of these systems in classroom settings. This is particularly important in mathematics, where genAI is a shift from historic adaptive intelligent tutoring systems. We...
Caitlin K. Kirby, Kanyi Eing, J. Zimmerman et al.· International Journal of Edu...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.