Sep 2026· Cancer Urology· 0 citations· 11 references
TL;DR
The method demonstrated acceptable safety and efficacy results; however, continued follow-up is necessary to determine long-term outcomes, as the method demonstrated acceptable safety and efficacy results.
Abstract
Background. Active surveillance is a widely used treatment for clinically localized low-risk prostate cancer in the Western countries; however, its safety and efficacy in the Belarussian healthcare settings have not been established.
Aim. To evaluate the short-term outcomes of active surveillance in our cohort and to analyze predictive factors for reclassification.
Materials and methods. The study included 249 patients with verified clinically localized prostate cancer, a life expectancy of ≥10 years, and at least one surveillance biopsy. The primary endpoint was survival (time) to reclassification (increased differentiation group or increased clinical stage). Various predictive factors for reclassification were also analyzed.
Results. Median follow-up was 31.2 months (95 % confidence interval 28.2–34.1 months). Tumor reclassification occurred in 62 cases (24.9 %). Median time to reclassification was 65.2 months, and to treatment, 55 months. According to multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen density (p 0.001) and percentage of positive cores in biopsy (p = 0.006) were the most significant predictors of reclassification.
Conclusion. The method demonstrated acceptable safety and efficacy results; however, continued follow-up is necessary to determine long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND
The oncologic surveillance after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains poorly defined.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate a model-derived, risk-adapted surveillance approach and estimate when the modeled OCM hazard exceeds the modeled recurrence hazard.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Retrospective, population-based s...
F. Pellegrino, U. Falagario, A. Abbadi et al.· European Urology Oncology· 0 citations
Introduction: High- and very high-risk (H/vHR) localized and locally advanced prostate cancer (LPCa) carry a high burden of distant relapse. In light of emerging data on adjunctive systemic therapy, we aimed to assess present-day, real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among Canadian patients with intermediate-risk...
C. Wallis, Shawn Malone, I. Cagiannos et al.· Canadian Urological Associat...· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
Active surveillance (AS) allows men with favorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) to avoid or delay the toxicity of upfront treatment. However, whether these patients are at higher risk of subsequent treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is unknown. Herein, we examine real-world burd...
James R. Janopaul-Naylor, D. Patil, N. Sebastian et al.· Urologic oncology· 0 citations
PURPOSE
Benefit of post-treatment surveillance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), characterized by high recurrence risk, remains unexplored. We explored whether regular post-treatment surveillance facilitates earlier recurrence detection and improves survival.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We identified 8,798 patients with n...
Chen-Fei Wu, Qiu-Yi Pan, Yu-Xian Yang et al.· Radiotherapy and Oncology· 0 citations
Active surveillance (AS) is an established management strategy for men with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients ultimately undergo radical prostatectomy (RP), and the impact of prior AS on subsequent outcomes remains uncertain. We therefore comp...
I. Hannestad, T. Myklebust, S. Fosså et al.· World journal of urology· 0 citations