Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

S1 and S2 Are Positions, Not Signifiers: What Lacan Saw in the Möbius Cut

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Lacan wrote that a signifier represents the subject for another signifier — S1 → S2 — and the subject is often pictured as a loop between S1 and S2. Read as a labelling of a closed chain, that picture has a flaw two crayons can expose: around a chain with an odd number of links, two colours cannot alternate. This note proves where the alternation does exist. Lay the closed chain on a surface and cut along it. If the chain has two sides, the edge of the cut is two copies of it and the flaw remains. If it has one side — possible only on surfaces that contain a Möbius band — the edge of the cut is a single double loop that runs around twice, meets every signifier twice, and always alternates. For an odd chain, every signifier is then S1 on one lap and S2 on the other, necessarily. S1 and S2 are positions, not signifiers. What Lacan saw, and what was forgotten. Lacan said each piece of this: S1 means «signifier index 1», not «the signifier that takes precedence»; the Möbius band «is nothing but the cut itself», and the cut is a double loop; it takes two turns to grasp the division of the subject. The usual reading puts the S1–S2 loop and the Möbius band side by side, or simply identifies them, without the piece that joins them: the double loop. The theorems supply it, and show that for an odd chain the loop exists only on the double loop. Every quotation is given in French with its date, page and corpus reference, and none is used as a premise. Six theorems (proved for every surface) I · Two sides or one. One-sided chains exist exactly on surfaces with a twist (Möbius band, Klein bottle, projective plane), with any number of signifiers. II · The cut that does not cut in two. Cutting along a one-sided chain leaves the surface in one piece. III · The double loop. The edge of the cut is two copies of the chain (two sides), or one loop of twice the length that meets every signifier once from each side (one side). IV · Forced division. On the double loop the S1/S2 alternation always exists; for an odd chain it is unique and splits every signifier. With two sides the split is optional, and for odd chains impossible. V · The odd chain. For an odd chain, the S1–S2 loop and the divided signifier exist only on the double loop. VI · The subject in the cut. The double loop keeps one subject, who runs around twice; a two-sided cut doubles the subject or loses it, depending on one decision the theory leaves open. What Lacan did not say. Parity. On a Möbius band an even chain is divided nowhere: each signifier gets the same label on both laps. What it does not claim. Nothing about knowledge and truth, the unconscious, or the clinic. The surface is added structure, not derived. Six falsifiers are stated; none was found. Files S1_S2_positions.pdf — the note: definitions, theorems with proofs, the Lacan dossier, falsifiers, scope of the verification, open problems (12 pages). mobius_cut.py — the verifier. Builds six surfaces as glued square grids (disk, annulus, torus, Möbius band, Klein bottle, projective plane), lays 159 closed chains of 3 to 8 signifiers, cuts along each one, computes the edge of the cut from the faces around each junction, and checks Theorems I to VI, enumerating every labelling. Standard library only; exit code 0 iff all checks pass. With --svg it also draws Figures 2 to 4. It was tested by breaking it: three deliberate faults are detected. fig1_mobius_core7.png — a chain of seven signifiers on the core of a Möbius band. fig2_four_cases.png / .svg — the edge of the cut in the four cases (odd or even, one side or two), computed by the verifier. fig3_boundary_walk.svg / .webm — animation: a point walks the double loop and leaves S1 and S2 behind it; each of the seven signifiers gets both. fig3_boundary_walk_static.png — the still. fig5_from_letter_to_double_loop.html / .webm — the whole story in 80 seconds: from Lacan's formula S1 → S2 to the flat strip, the Möbius band, the double loop seen from above with the subject running it, and the words LOVED and HATED read on a single edge (Lacan's hainamoration). The .html plays in any browser and pauses with the space bar. fig4_subject.svg / .webm — animation: the subject in the cut. On the two-sided cut two subjects run, or the subject fades; on the double loop one subject runs around twice. fig4_subject_static.png — the still. How to reproduce python mobius_cut.py python mobius_cut.py --svg figures Series. Readable on its own. It belongs to the A₂ series, a formal reconstruction of the Lacanian signifying chain; Appendix A maps it onto A Formal Environment for the Lacanian Signifying Chain and Repetition as a Theorem.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.