Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Clinical Skill Architecture: a framework for translating rating-scale ontologies into LLM agents

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Changelog All notable changes to clinical-skill-architecture will be documented in this file. The format follows Keep a Changelog and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning. [0.2.0] — 2026-09-21 Revision release accompanying the revised npj Digital Medicine manuscript. No change to the skill files, prompts or pipeline logic (prompt version stays 1.0.0); the release corrects the documentation and adds the suite-independence tooling. Fixed docs/reproduce_paper.md, README.md, MODEL_CARD.md: the synthetic figures F1 0.840 / sensitivity 0.971 were attributed to Claude Sonnet 4.6; they were produced by Claude Opus 4.6 (Sonnet 4.6: F1 0.824). Removed figures that correspond to no result file (decision accuracy 0.94, weighted κ 0.92, Cohen's κ 0.68, Spearman ρ ≈ 0.41, an "Opus 4.7" run). Table numbers now match the revised manuscript's table titles rather than an earlier draft. docs/reproduce_paper.md: GLM-5 through openai_compat documented as the paper's primary configuration and primary reproduction route; the Claude runs are documented as CLI runs. extras/paper_reproduction/README.md: the scripts are adapted copies, not verbatim copies. README.md Step 5: the human-agreement guidance names the statistic and level of analysis (screening κ, subscale-presence κ, weighted-sum ICC) instead of an unqualified "κ ≥ 0.6". DISCLAIMER.md: aligned with the manuscript's classification (research software; not clinical decision support; not a medical device) and its seven preconditions for clinical use. config/output_format.md example: HOP coding weight 3 → 1 (HOP is a flat-weight subscale; no output was affected). Suite v1.0 figures for GLM-5 restated from the current evaluator (F1 0.629, precision 0.650, one false-positive coding fewer than the artefact archived in March 2026); Claude Opus 4.6 is unchanged. Added Concept DOI (10.5281/zenodo.20435438) recorded in CITATION.cff and the README software citation; the software citation's version was still 0.1.0 and is now 0.2.0. README: the "Adapting the framework to your own scale" recipe now warns that lifting examples into skill files and extrapolating from seed examples are where test-set independence is lost, and points at the gate; the citation block carries the revised article title. synthetic/independence_gate.py: skill-file independence gate (sequence ratio ≥ 0.7 or shared five-token phrase) and synthetic/suite_v11.json, the 90-instance de-overlapped suite v1.1; generate_all.py --strict refuses instances that fail the gate. csa.eval.evaluate_run(..., instance_ids=...) to evaluate on a subset such as v1.1. Expert-arm and construct-validity figures, with their reference standards and the calibration limit (weighted-sum ICC 0.21), in MODEL_CARD.md and README.md. [0.1.0] — 2026-04-23 Initial public release accompanying the npj Digital Medicine submission. Added score() and score_async() module-level functions and GGAgent class Anthropic backend with prompt caching enabled by default OpenAI-compatible backend (Requesty.ai, OpenRouter, vLLM, Ollama) 7 subscale skills (HOP, SAC, PMR, SOM, DAM, SEP, HOS) loaded via importlib.resources Two-stage screening + per-subscale detail pipeline csa-score console script csa.eval evaluation harness with hierarchical accuracy, Clopper-Pearson CIs, Cohen's and weighted kappa 3 demo synthetic instances bundled inside the wheel Full 150-instance synthetic suite generator at synthetic/ Copy of the paper pipeline scripts at extras/paper_reproduction/ 34-test suite covering fragmenter, scorer, validator, eval metrics, agent smoke

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

GPT-Lab Sep 23, 2026

Requirements Don’t Live in Isolation: What We’re Exploring with Req-Space

Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.