Skip to content

BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN TESTING AND DEBUGGING THROUGH EXPLAINABLE DEEP ORACLES

· 0 citations · 99 references

TL;DR

This research presents Seer, a learning-based approach that in the absence of test assertions or other types of oracle, can determine whether a unit test passes or fails on a given method under test (MUT).

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Fail-Aware and Explainable Test Oracle Prediction

Early results suggest that fail-aware discriminative oracle prediction can complement existing approaches such as fuzzing, search-based testing, and LLM-based test generation and attach fault-aware predicted oracles to them, turning high-volume input generation into executable tests that are more likely to expose semantic failures.

Yue Zhao, Binish Tanveer, Jelena Zdravkovic · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Validation Evidence in LLM Repair Agents: How Much of What Passes Actually Tests the Bug?

When a repair agent runs a test and sees it pass, the result is treated as evidence about the reported defect. We measure how often that treatment is warranted. BSG-VA (buggy-state/candidate-state/gold-fix validation analysis) captures each validation command at its exact working-tree state, extracts a test-only patch, and replays the command on the original buggy code (B), the candidate state (S), and the developer gold fix (G). The captured outcome and the replay results assign every event an evidence role, from gold-aligned bug-discriminating through regression-only to misleading. Across 3,730 events in 643 rollouts on 110 tasks, 46.0% of positive comparable events carry no bug-discriminating information; 23.8% of baseline rollouts, with no feedback injected, close with a patch whose entire positive evidence base is of this kind. A three-arm experiment tests whether returning the B-replay outcome to the agent changes this pattern. Bug-contrast feedback reduces evidence-inadequate closure by 7.8 percentage points relative to an attention-matched reminder (p = 0.0029) and raises bug-discriminating evidence by 7.4 points (p = 0.011), with no detectable cost to repair success. Both estimates fall below the prespecified 10-percentage-point smallest effect size of interest, so practical magnitude remains uncertain. Roughly a third of the improvement traces to the reminder alone; across two exploratory replications, varying the scaffold and the model, the B-replay content adds a detectable increment only with gpt-5.6-sol under the unconstrained tool-use loop. BSG-VA applies post hoc to any replayable repair trajectory that preserves the required code states and execution environment. Keywords: program repair agents, validation evidence, test adequacy, large language models, software quality, controlled experiment.

Xiaonan Xu, Wenjing Wu · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Beyond Fail-to-Pass: Iterative Hardening of Co-Generated Bug Reproduction Tests and Fixes

CoHarden is proposed, a co-generation framework that uses the Lax signal as an in-loop convergence criterion that generates a test before any fix, then iteratively hardens the test and fix against surviving mutation patches until the generated test no longer admits Lax regressions.

Yuhao Tan, Zhibang Yang, Fangkai Yang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Documentation vs. Code Patterns: What Drives LLM-Based Exception Oracle Generation?

Future TOG systems should be evaluated not only by whether they predict the correct oracle type, but also by whether their predictions are grounded in meaningful exception-triggering evidence, to challenge the assumption that strong exception-oracle accuracy reflects robust use of exception semantics.

Soneya Binta Hossain, Matthew B. Dwyer, Tasfia Tasnim · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Improving Bug Detection in LLM-Generated Unit Tests: Revisiting Test-Oracle Reliability Across Modern Large Language Models

This paper presents a formal mathematical model for categorizing the outcome of generated-tests into four classes, a couple of basic metrics: Bug-Revealing Rate (BRR) and Bug-Validating Rate (BVR); and two basic statistical tests to ensure that the results are rigorous.

Zeyad Farooq Lutfi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.