Sep 2026· IEEE transactions on computers· Vol 75, pp. 3397-3409· 0 citations· 40 references
Abstract
Thanks to notable performance and capacity advantages, NVMe SSDs promise an effective cache tier for alleviating the load pressure of back-end storage servers. Compared with DRAM, an NVMe SSD exhibits up to hundreds of times larger capacity but delivers two orders of magnitude smaller bandwidth per gigabyte. This paper reveals that these hardware characteristics challenge fundamental design goals of caches: (1) storing tons of objects in a large-capacity SSD easily induces severe, persistent fragmentation, resulting in low cache space utilization; (2) intensive front-end requests contend for limited SSD bandwidth, causing unpredictable cache lookup latency. To tackle these challenges, this paper presents Gemini. The core of Gemini is heat-informed, group-based object management with a hardware-assisted I/O prioritization mechanism. Specifically, we introduce a tree-based prediction model for agile object grouping and fast reaction to hotspot shift. It provides SSD-friendly, bulk object eviction with a zero-write, remapping-based migration mechanism. In addition, to ensure request performance, we propose a novel I/O model that mitigates bandwidth congestion and prioritizes their processing at the hardware layer. Evaluation results show that Gemini delivers up to 3.8<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\boldsymbol{\times}}$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="cai-ieq1-3711088.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> throughput improvement, 2<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\boldsymbol{\times}}$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="cai-ieq2-3711088.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> tail latency reduction, and 2.7<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\boldsymbol{\times}}$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="cai-ieq3-3711088.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> higher cache space utilization than state-of-the-art caches for both YCSB workloads and production applications.
FLINT is proposed, a workload-driven HBF substrate for capacity-scalable LLM inference that integrates HBF as a memory-capacity tier alongside HBM while addressing three adoption challenges.
Geraldo F. Oliveira, Arash Tavakkol, Xiang-Yu Zhu et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes SAI, a mechanism that virtualizes shared memory into the L2 cache to improve GPU performance for AI applications and introduces an L2 cache management strategy that integrates associativity-based virtual page allocation and a replacement information table, reducing page-swapping overhead while preserving L2 cache performance.
Hanqing Li, Tiejun Li, Sheng Ma et al.· ACM Transactions on Design A...· 0 citations
KV-cache offload is widely used to stretch GPU memory for LLM serving, but its storage behavior has not been characterized at the block-device level. In this paper, we study LMCache through realworld multi-session workloads that span same/different context $\times$ same/different prompt, using over 100 stateless requests per workload. Our comparison is observational rather than factorial: it contrasts two realizable deployment snapshots—LMCache 0.3.0 with buffered I/O and the kernel page cache, and LMCache 0.3.16 with prefix-aware deduplication and O_DIRECT. Key findings define the paper. First, the legacy stack appears almost read-free at the SSD layer in all four workloads, but a flush_ram experiment shows that this is conditional on page-cache warmth: once the cache is evicted, the same path issues about 1 GB of sequential reads in 683 ms. Second, deduplication delivers a dramatic write reduction only for the exact-repeat workload: one set collapses from 1.62 GB to 11.75 MB of writes, while the other three sets remain in the 2–5 GB range. Third, O_DIRECT converts a hidden and bimodal read cost into an explicit and stable one: on one set, warm TTFT rises from 27 ms to 93 ms because each of the 99 warm requests re-reads the same ~12 MB partial chunk from SSD. The main conclusion is therefore not “newer is better,” but a system trade-off: predictability versus average-case latency.
Ying He, Dingsen Shi, Yanbo Dai et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Ghost is an OS-level GPU virtualization layer integrated directly into the open-source GPU driver, using a GPU container abstraction with cgroup -like APIs for compute and memory control and privileged hardware-level scheduling and preemption for dynamic compute resource management.
SLIM (Saturation-Aware Lightweight Performance Model), a semi-analytical model that predicts LLM inference throughput and latency from analytical formulations of Transformer computation and memory traffic, is introduced, which outperforms representative performance-modeling baselines while successfully generalizing to previously unseen operating conditions.
Pol G. Recasens, F. Agulló, Yue Zhu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
In cloud computing, multi-tenant shared storage is widely used for efficiency. ZNS SSDs have become a popular choice due to their high throughput and low latency. However, they still face challenges: the zone structure is not exposed to tenants, making performance control difficult, and the multi-namespace design can lead to wasted performance when tenant workloads are highly imbalanced. This paper proposes a tenant pressure-aware performance isolation scheme, called IP-Zone, that partitions users into independent regions and maximizes zone parallelism through cross-resource allocation and flexible address mapping. For severely unbalanced loads, a complementary load-aware strategy dynamically reallocates bandwidth among tenants to improve SSD utilization. Experiments show that this scheme improves IOPS and throughput by 34.6% and 25.0% over traditional channel isolation, while average and tail latencies are reduced by 76.3% and 36.0% compared to black-box sharing.