Legitimacy Construction in Discourse: A Honnethian Analysis of the “New Lee Jae-myung” Case

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the “New Lee Jae-myung” discourse, focusing on the forum titled “Discussing New Lee Jae-myung” held at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building on March 15, 2026, through the lens of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. It aims to explore how legitimacy is constructed within discourse. Method: This study employs qualitative discourse analysis of forum discussions, related interviews, and media reports. Drawing on recognition theory, the analysis focuses on how discursive practices construct patterns of recognition and misrecognition among different groups. Findings: The analysis reveals three key findings. First, the naming of “New Lee Jae-myung” functions not merely as a descriptive category but as a normative orientation that prioritizes particular groups as subjects to be recognized. Second, although the discourse appears to promote inclusiveness, it simultaneously repositions existing supporters, thereby reconfiguring the criteria of legitimacy. Third, certain expressions construct critical groups as marginal or inappropriate participants, which may limit their recognition within the discursive space. Implications: These findings suggest that the discourse operates beyond neutral description, functioning as a mechanism that redistributes recognition and reshapes structures of legitimacy. This study highlights the importance of discursive conditions that enable multiple forms of recognition and emphasizes that legitimacy should be understood as a relational and dynamic process rather than a fixed standard.