Skip to content
Preprint

Endpoint Differentiability Moduli for Fully Nonlinear Elliptic Equations

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Mathematics

Abstract

A classical consequence of Caffarelli's fully nonlinear regularity theory [L. A. Caffarelli, Ann. of Math. (2) 130 (1989), no. 1, 189-213] is that viscosity solutions of uniformly elliptic equations $F(D^2u)=f$, with $f\in L^p$, $p>n$, are locally $C^{1,\gamma}$ for every $\gamma<\min\{\alpha_H,\sigma_p\}$. Here $\alpha_H=\alpha_H(n,\lambda,\Lambda)\in(0,1)$ denotes the universal H\"older exponent for gradient regularity of $F(D^2h)=0$, while $\sigma_p=1-n/p$ is the scaling exponent of the source term. In the source-limited regime $\sigma_p<\alpha_H$, the singularity of $f$ is the decisive obstruction and the endpoint $\gamma=\sigma_p$ is attainable. In the homogeneous-limited regime $\alpha_H\le\sigma_p$, however, classical theory only yields $\gamma<\alpha_H$, leaving the limiting differentiability estimate unquantified. This is the endpoint gap addressed here. When $\alpha_H<\sigma_p$, we prove that solutions admit pointwise Taylor expansions satisfying $|u(x)-u(x_0)-Du(x_0)\cdot(x-x_0)|\lesssim |x-x_0|^{1+\alpha_H}\left(1+\log\frac{1}{|x-x_0|}\right)^m$. Thus the homogeneous differentiability scale is reached up to an explicit logarithmic defect. At the critical threshold $\alpha_H=\sigma_p$, finite logarithmic powers no longer close the iteration; nevertheless, a slower selection of scales yields $|u(x)-u(x_0)-Du(x_0)\cdot(x-x_0)|=O\left(|x-x_0|^{1+\alpha_H}\exp\left(A\sqrt{1+\log\frac{1}{|x-x_0|}}\right)\right)$. Both estimates improve the full family of classical sub-endpoint $C^{1,\gamma}$ bounds, $\gamma<\alpha_H$, by quantifying differentiability at the limiting homogeneous exponent. The proof introduces a new scale-selection mechanism for endpoint Campanato-type recurrences, suggesting a flexible tool whenever the limiting smoothness is dictated by the homogeneous theory itself. We also discuss the role and possible optimality of the resulting logarithmic defects.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.