Feature-robust Augmentation is introduced, which comprises diversified degradation-aware augmentation strategies, and a supervised contrastive learning pattern paired with a mean-teacher architecture that stabilizes features against augmentations through consistency constraints that wins the first place in ACM Multimedia 2026 Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge.
Abstract
Explainable deepfake detection extends binary classification by requiring models to not only predict authenticity but also provide interpretable justifications. This expanded scope is critical in practice, where users like forensic analysts need insight into the rationale behind the detection. Despite advancements, current approaches suffer from two critical deficiencies: (1)vulnerability to image quality degradation: detection accuracy plummets on low-quality samples, while naive augmentation strategies may induce feature drift and impair performance as diversity expands. (2) factually flawed explanations: explanation models may omit manipulation evidence or hallucinate irrelevant details, undermining interpretability. To address it, we propose a framework with two innovations. For robust deepfake detection, we introduce Feature-robust Augmentation, which comprises diversified degradation-aware augmentation strategies, and a supervised contrastive learning pattern paired with a mean-teacher architecture that stabilizes features against augmentations through consistency constraints. For explanation, we devise an evidence-grounded preference optimization process that guides model to prioritize genuine manipulation traces by learning from chosen-rejected explanation pairs, where rejected samples are constructed via evidence omission or irrelevant information injection. The proposed approach wins the first place in ACM Multimedia 2026 Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge.The code is available at https://github.com/oceanflowlab/EDD.git.
The Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge at ACM Multimedia 2026 is designed to benchmark this joint capability of classification metrics with semantic similarity, simplicity, and intent-aware grounding metrics that assess whether explanations identify the relevant manipulated entities and supporting visual evidence.
An uncertainty-aware deepfake detection framework that identifies manipulations through inconsistencies across complementary evidence sources by introducing Inter-Branch Disagreement Calibration (IBDC), a disagreement-aware uncertainty modeling mechanism that links predictive uncertainty to conflicts among evidence streams.
Muhammad Umar Farooq, Kutub Uddin, Awais Khan et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
This review explores the key techniques for explainability in deep visual recognition, including model-agnostic methods such as LIME and SHAP, model-specific approaches like saliency maps and feature visualization, and intrinsically interpretable models like decision trees and rule-based systems.
A robust, explainable detection framework is presented that combines a CNN backbone for extracting spatial artifacts with an LSTM module for modeling temporal inconsistencies across frames that enhances forensic decision support and increases practical readiness for content verification systems.
Lastone Banda, Esther J.· International Journal of Dat...· 0 citations
Recent advances in video generation models have significantly improved the realism of synthetic videos, blurring the boundary between generated and authentic content and raising concerns about misinformation. Existing MLLM-based detectors mainly rely on supervised fine-tuning or label-level reinforcement learning, where coarse supervision limits generalization to unseen scenarios and emerging video generators. To overcome these limitations, we are the first to introduce \textbf{meta-detection} into AI-generated video detection, enabling reliable forgery detection by jointly optimizing predicted labels and supporting evidence within reinforcement learning. This paradigm requires reliable evidence signals and effective mechanisms to integrate them into label-level optimization. Textual rationales provide semantic descriptions of forgery artifacts, but their generation and verification depend on external models, making supervision vulnerable to hallucinations and semantic biases. In contrast, temporal grounding provides more objective and verifiable evidence, as manipulated intervals can be precisely controlled during forgery construction. Based on this insight, we propose an automated data construction pipeline that generates paired real-fake videos by replacing temporal segments with boundary-frame-conditioned video generation models. Furthermore, we introduce \textbf{Evidence-Guided Reward Redistribution}, which performs evidence-aware credit assignment by redistributing rewards among label-correct responses according to evidence quality. This preserves reliable label supervision while encouraging detectors to acquire fine-grained and verifiable forgery localization capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that \textbf{VidForensics-M1} effectively leverages verifiable temporal evidence to achieve robust and generalizable AI-generated video detection.
Bowei Liu, Zheng Lu, Yuhan Bian et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.