Oct 2026· IEEE Sensors Journal· Vol 26, pp. 28658-28667· 0 citations· 29 references
Abstract
In the research of ultrawideband (UWB) indoor positioning, non-line-of-sight (NLOS) signals constitute the core bottleneck leading to the degradation of positioning accuracy. Existing NLOS/line-of-sight (LOS) classification methods suffer from three key limitations: they fail to fully exploit the complex-value characteristics of UWB signals and rely mostly on single-channel amplitude inputs, thus losing phase and positive-negative information; their generalization ability is insufficient, resulting in a significant decline in classification performance in complex unknown environments; and they have serious parameter redundancy, making it difficult to adapt to low-power edge computing scenarios. To address the above problems, this article proposes a Multiscale Gated Fusion Network (MSGFN). Taking the real and imaginary parts of the channel impulse response (CIR) as dual-channel input, MSGFN captures the scattered fluctuation characteristics of NLOS signals and the stable trend of LOS signals, respectively, through parallel multiscale convolution branches. It introduces a gated attention mechanism to dynamically optimize the feature weights in temporal–spatial and channel dimensions and suppress noise interference. Besides, an A-Sigmoid-Log (ASL) activation function and absolute maximum pooling adapted to UWB complex-value signals are designed, and efficient parameter utilization is achieved by combining lightweight attention modules and strategic batch normalization. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves a classification accuracy of 88.63% in unknown environments, outperforming traditional amplitude-based input methods. Meanwhile, with a lightweight design of only 97 761 parameters, it demonstrates superior parameter efficiency compared with similar models. This work provides an effective solution for UWB signal classification in low-power edge computing scenarios.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.