2026· Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics· pp. 16689-16715· 0 citations· 70 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work investigates the problem of LLM knowledge updates, which requires simultaneously unlearning unwanted information and learning new knowledge, and proposes LOKA, a conflict-aware framework for Large language mOdel Knowledge updAtes.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing by encoding extensive knowledge, but their utility relies on timely updates as human knowledge keeps evolving. In this paper, we investigate the problem of LLM knowledge updates, which requires simultaneously unlearning unwanted information and learning new knowledge. Existing approaches that tackle unlearning and learning separately encounter task conflicts and knowledge management issues when applied to comprehensive knowledge updates. In this paper, we validate our findings with theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, and propose LOKA, a conflict-aware framework for Large language mOdel Knowledge updAtes. During training, LOKA introduces an adaptive knowledge memory approach in which updated knowledge is allocated across multiple memory units. During inference, LOKA retrieves the most relevant memory unit from the knowledge memory and integrates it with the original LLM to apply updated knowledge, while a learning-based router controls the activation of the knowledge memory to improve knowledge utilization. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of LOKA in achieving accurate, flexible, and conflict-aware knowledge updates.
The results suggest that effective long-horizon agent memory depends less on storing more information than on deciding which information should remain active, and that effective long-horizon agent memory depends less on storing more information than on deciding which information should remain active.
It is argued that effective knowledge editing must account for the intricate nature of knowledge representation, and three promising research directions are proposed that respect the complexity of knowledge representation in a real-world setting.
TARL is introduced, a memory state update framework that maps each statement to one of five executable actions and is trained by comparing the memory states produced by alternative update operations, encouraging the model to select the operation that leads to the correct result.
Han Xiao, Hongjun Xu, Xin Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) rely on static pretraining corpora, causing their knowledge to become outdated over time. Existing approaches for evaluating knowledge edits either suffer from rapid contamination or rely on counterfactual edits that conflict with rigid existing knowledge. In this work, we propose a synthetic, simulation-driven framework for studying knowledge insertion in LLMs. We introduce {\sc ParallelEvents}, a benchmark of fictional yet realistic future worlds that generates coherent event trajectories for controlled evaluation, avoiding contamination while preserving consistency. Building on this dataset, we develop {\sc Synapse}, a training framework that uses model-generated data to update model parameters via mid-training and instruction tuning. This synthetic pipeline enables scalable knowledge integration without costly human-curated data. Empirically, {\sc Synapse} outperforms existing methods by 14.23\%, demonstrating that simulation-based synthetic training leads to robust and coherent knowledge insertions.
Jonathan Zheng, Zi-Rui Shao, Alan Ritter et al.· 0 citations
This work studies insight-level memory maintenance for long-term language agents and proposes a failure-aware memory maintenance framework based on an editable insight graph and introduces a utility-aware retrieval mechanism and a graph controller that updates the memory graph after task execution.
Yuxi Qian, Yuxiang Ren· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.