Skip to content
Open access

Sensitivity-Guided BESS Siting and Sizing with Uncertainty-Aware Scheduling in Renewable-Rich Distribution Networks

Sep 2026 · Symmetry · 0 citations

Abstract

High penetrations of wind and photovoltaic generation create simultaneous challenges for battery energy storage system (BESS) planning in distribution networks, including differences in nodal regulation value, power-energy configuration, and day-ahead operation under forecast uncertainty. This study develops a sequential planning-to-operation workflow comprising candidate-bus generation, siting and sizing within the candidate set, and finite-scenario day-ahead scheduling for a fixed configuration. First, nodal net-injection sensitivities, Jacobian-assisted pre-screening, and deterministic topology/support safeguards are used to generate the main candidate set, and alternating-current (AC) finite-difference refinement is performed only for the sensitivity-led fast set; in the IEEE-33 system, this refinement reduces the number of AC power-flow calls from 65 for full-node analysis to 17. Next, Sensitivity-Guided Envelope-Based Nonanticipative Adjustable Recourse Optimal Power Flow (SG-ENAR-OPF) is solved separately for each bus in the main candidate set; the BESS location and power/energy capacities are jointly determined subject to the P-Q LinDistFlow model, BESS duration constraints, a shared affine response, and finite-scenario constraints. The full-node audit serves only as an independent paper-level validation benchmark and is not part of the deployable workflow. After the configuration is fixed, interval forecasts for load, photovoltaic (PV) output, and wind-turbine (WT) output at // are used to construct 25 static load-renewable disturbance points and seven temporal stress paths, over which a shared finite-scenario day-ahead policy is optimized. The IEEE-33 MAIN case selects Bus 30, with BESS capacities of approximately 10.66 MW/10.66 MWh. Using scaled public time-series data, the final policy is replayed over 46 consecutive 24 h execution windows, comprising 1104 h actual trajectories; under the 0.002 MW/MWh storage-engineering criterion, all 46/46 windows pass storage engineering validation, and energy continuity is maintained across all 45/45 interday boundaries. Further nonlinear AC post-validation converges at all 1104/1104 operating points, of which 1058/1104 satisfy the complete voltage and branch-capacity constraints. Supplementary results for IEEE-69 show that the workflow can be executed on a second radial test feeder. However, the conclusions are strictly limited to the tested feeders, finite scenarios, scaled public-data settings, and stated engineering tolerances and do not constitute a formal guarantee over a continuous uncertainty domain or of general cross-system applicability.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.