VIC-RAGENT is proposed, an LLM-based multi-agent framework for effective and explainable vulnerability detection that employs a multi-stage reasoning process that progressively refines candidate vulnerabilities through preliminary inspection, reanalysis, and a final decision stage.
Abstract
Detecting vulnerability-inducing commits (VICs) at submission time is critical for improving the security and reliability of software systems. However, this task is highly challenging because it requires reasoning about the semantic impact of code changes from heterogeneous information sources, including code diffs, commit messages, and the surrounding contextual code. Existing approaches often struggle to fully capture these complex interactions, resulting in limited detection performance. In this paper, we propose VIC-RAGENT, an LLM-based multi-agent framework for effective and explainable vulnerability detection. VIC-RAGENT leverages multiple specialized agents to provide complementary perspectives, including structural analysis, intent understanding, and vulnerability inspection. To further improve detection reliability, the framework employs a multi-stage reasoning process that progressively refines candidate vulnerabilities through preliminary inspection, reanalysis, and a final decision stage. Experimental results on a real-world dataset across multiple LLMs demonstrate that VIC-RAGENT consistently outperforms baselines, including Direct, CoT, and CodeAgent. Compared to the strongest baseline, VIC-RAGENT achieves 1.2-1.7x higher F1-scores across different models. Overall, VIC-RAGENT offers a robust, explainable, and practical solution for detecting VICs in modern software development workflows.
Detecting source code vulnerabilities is increasingly difficult as modern security flaws are rooted in complex causal dependencies between execution flows, control conditions, and program states. Despite recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-agent frameworks, existing approaches primarily address superficial similarities between benign and vulnerable functions while failing to capture the complex causal dependencies inherent in security flaws. To address these limitations, we propose Causal Context-based Agentic Reasoning (CLEAR), a novel multi-agent vulnerability detection framework integrated with a causal knowledge graph. CLEAR systematically constructs a Vulnerability Causal Knowledge Graph (VCKG) that models the causal chains between entrypoints, preconditions, root causes, and fix intents across vulnerability instances. Leveraging this structured knowledge, four specialized agents, including the Collector, Claim, Critic, and Judge, collaboratively verify vulnerability hypotheses through retrieved causal contexts. Experimental results on C/C++ and Java vulnerability benchmarks demonstrate that CLEAR improves Pair-Correct (P-C) performance by 130.7% and 71.56% over state-of-the-art approaches, demonstrating the effectiveness of causal knowledge graph-guided reasoning for automated vulnerability detection.
Sungju Yun, Sijune Hwang, Yeonjoon Lee et al.· 0 citations
DREA (Decoupled Reasoning and Exploration Agents), a hypothesis-driven framework for repository-level vulnerability detection, improves Pair-Correctness from 19-26% to 30-42% while offloading over 93% of tokens to the explorer, reducing estimated billable API cost by a factor of 16-48.
VICBench enables robust evaluation of vulnerability detection approaches and shows that state-of-the-art algorithms V-SZZ and LLM4SZZ achieve only 33.3%-40.1% F1, confirming that using existing approaches still entails significant manual effort.
Jin Lu, Xuening Han, Yan Zhong et al.· 0 citations
An evaluation of five state-of-the-art LLMs on OmniVul reveals distinct performance gaps, with top-1 accuracy remaining below 50% on average for vulnerable code detection and CVE identification, demonstrating that current models lack critical reasoning capabilities for reliable vulnerability assessment.
Vishnu Teja Kandalam, Viet Duong, Xiaochang Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
AssertMate is proposed, a novel agent-based assertion generation framework that enhances the quality and reliability of LLM-generated assertions through three key components: actual value construction that identifies assertion targets via static analysis and type-aware heuristics, and multi-perspective expected value prediction using code generation, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning agents.
Dong Wang, Qiaoyu Han, Lin Yang et al.· 0 citations
This study introduces a framework for identifying and repairing vulnerabilities in smart contracts by utilizing multi-relational graphs combined with a pre-trained model, significantly outperforming current baseline approaches.
Jinlong Bai, Lifeng Cao, Xingchen Li et al.· Cybersecurity· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
