Skip to content
Review Open access

Weaponised UAV threats to structures: Contact-burst loading, structural response and passive countermeasures

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Protective Structures · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

Weaponised unmanned aerial systems delivering explosive payloads at near-zero standoff constitute a load class not addressed by existing blast design standards, which were calibrated for ground-level perimeter threats. This review treats conflict evidence from the Russia–Ukraine war as a source of new structural load cases rather than a military technology survey, applying a six-class evidence hierarchy to separate peer-reviewed engineering data from operational observations. Three domains are synthesised: drone-delivered munition load characteristics; structural response to near-field and contact-burst loading on reinforced concrete roofs and cable-net barriers; and passive protective systems including hardened shelters, sacrificial covers, Protective Cable Net Structures, vehicle cages and blast-resistant glazing. Peer-reviewed contact-burst analyses, spanning both numerical modelling and independent live-fire testing, establish that grenade-equivalent payloads produce superficial roof damage without occupant injury, whereas larger UAV payloads breach both centreline- and top-and-bottom-reinforced slabs, generating lethal localised fragment hazards. Top-and-bottom reinforcement and steel-fibre reinforcement each substantially reduce fragment mass and occupant hazard, the latter confirmed by live-fire testing, though standoff distance remains the dominant control on damage mode. Insufficient cable diameter and mesh cell size are shown to be inadequate for reliable shaped-charge pre-detonation, providing quantitative lower-bound net specifications. The review concludes that roofs and overhead apertures must be treated as primary protective elements, and that evidence-qualified combinations of hardening, standoff, sacrificial layers, pre-detonation screening and aperture sealing are required. Priority research needs are drone-specific contact-burst testing protocols, validated near-field blast models and residual capacity assessment of nets and cages under repeated impacts.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.