Sustainability-Oriented Parametric Exergetic Analysis of Liquid Air Energy Storage Systems with Waste Heat and Cold Recovery
Abstract
Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) is a promising large-scale storage technology for supporting the sustainable integration of intermittent renewable electricity into power grids, particularly when electricity storage is combined with waste-heat valorization, cryogenic cold recovery, and reduced exergy degradation. In this thermodynamic sense, the present study proposes a sustainability-oriented framework for the comparative and parametric exergetic analysis of LAES systems, integrating the liquefaction and discharge stages within a unified analysis. The assessment focuses on thermodynamic resource efficiency and exergy performance rather than on a complete economic, environmental, or life-cycle evaluation. The objective is to identify the components and operating parameters that most strongly influence performance and to quantify the reductions in exergy destruction and losses achieved through configuration changes and parameter variation. Three Linde–Hampson-based liquefaction configurations are compared, including arrangements with external and intermediate auxiliary pre-cooling. Improved heat-exchanger integration and temperature matching increase the structural liquefaction exergetic indicator from 7.95% in the baseline configuration to 19.28% in the two-RHX configuration. The discharge stage is assessed parametrically with respect to cryogenic pumping pressure, turbine inlet temperature, and expansion architecture. Single-stage and two-stage adiabatic expansions are compared with an ideal isothermal benchmark. The adiabatic configurations provide mechanical-work recovery together with recoverable cooling potential, whereas the isothermal case gives the highest work-recovery benchmark. Under the reference conditions, using the aggregated compressor representation adopted for the main parametric analysis, the two-stage adiabatic configuration reaches a global exergetic efficiency of 15.92% for the improved Linde–Hampson-based chain and 24.87% for the selected Claude–Heylandt reference block.