This work completely closes the approximation gap between undirected and directed DS in the semi-streaming setting, matching the $(1-\varepsilon)-approximate undirected DS algorithm by Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi, and Woodruff (2016).
Abstract
We develop a new approach for computing approximate directed densest subgraphs (DDS). Our main result is a sparsification procedure that reduces a directed graph $G$ on $n$ vertices to a graph with $n \cdot \text{poly} \log n$ edges while preserving enough structure to recover an approximate DDS of $G$. Instantiating this framework in several memory-constrained settings, we obtain the following improvements over the state of the art: In semi-streaming, we obtain a single-pass algorithm that computes a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate DDS. Previously, the only semi-streaming algorithm that computed a constant approximation of DDS was by Bahmani, Kumar, and Vassilvitskii (2012), providing a $0.5-\varepsilon$ approximation in $O(\log n)$ passes. Hence, our work completely closes the approximation gap between undirected and directed DS in the semi-streaming setting, matching the $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate undirected DS algorithm by Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi, and Woodruff (2016). In the near-linear-memory MPC regime, we obtain an $O(1)$-round algorithm for $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate DDS, improving over the $O(\sqrt{\log n})$-round $(0.5-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm of Mitrovi\'c and Pan (2024). In the sublinear-time setting, we obtain an algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n)$ time, space, and oracle queries to compute a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate DDS, improving over the $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$ time, space, and query algorithm of Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi, and Woodruff (2016).
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.