Oct 2026· Civil Engineering Science and Technology· 0 citations· 27 references
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Abstract
Conventional transportation infrastructure inspection is often labor-intensive, time-consuming, and limited to individual asset types, reducing the efficiency of large-scale infrastructure management. This study proposes a hybrid Vision-AI and geospatial framework for automated multimodal infrastructure deterioration detection and digital asset monitoring. The framework integrates a YOLO-based object detection model, edge computing, geospatial synchronization, and a Digital Twin Web-GIS platform to detect, localize, and visualize infrastructure defects in real time. Experimental evaluation under multiple environmental conditions demonstrated stable detection performance, achieving 95.1% Precision, 94.3% Recall, 94.7% F1-score, and 96.4% mAP@0.5 under daylight conditions while maintaining reliable accuracy under shadowed, wet, and low-light environments. Edge deployment on the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano also provided low-latency inference suitable for real-time field applications. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of multimodal Vision-AI defect detection, edge computing, geospatial synchronization, and Digital Twin visualization within a unified framework capable of simultaneously monitoring heterogeneous transportation infrastructure assets. This study contributes by addressing the research gap between AI-based inspection and spatial asset management while providing an operational framework for automated maintenance decision support. The results demonstrate that integrating artificial intelligence with geospatial technologies can improve the accuracy, efficiency, and scalability of intelligent transportation infrastructure inspection and management.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.