Oct 2026· Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers· 0 citations
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Abstract
Aggressive semiconductor scaling toward sub-3 nm technology nodes requires advanced device optimization frameworks capable of efficiently exploring high-dimensional electrostatic design spaces while preserving physics accuracy and circuit-level applicability. Conventional Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) based optimization requires thousands of simulations, limiting scalability for sub-3 nm device design. This work proposes a physics-driven hybrid machine learning and multi-objective evolutionary optimization framework for electrostatic parameter optimization of sub-3 nm Gate-All-Around Multi-Bridge Channel FET (GAA MBCFET) devices targeting ultra-low-power IoT hardware. The framework integrates calibrated TCAD simulation, hybrid surrogate learning using XGBoost and Random Forest, and cellular multi-objective evolutionary optimization to enable fast design exploration under circuit-aware constraints. The hybrid surrogate achieves improved prediction fidelity (RMSE ≈ 0.47, R
2
up to 0.94) while reducing TCAD simulation requirements by ~78% and optimization runtime by ~65%. Device-level optimization achieves subthreshold swing of 57.6 mV/dec, ~22% DIBL reduction, ~40–45% leakage reduction, ~28–32% ON current improvement, and ~30–35% transconductance improvement. Multi-objective optimization improves Pareto hypervolume by ~32–38% with ~35% faster convergence. Circuit-level validation using a sub-3 nm GAA MBCFET SAR ADC demonstrates ~15–22% switching delay reduction and ~35–45% standby power reduction under low-voltage IoT operation. The proposed framework enables physics-consistent, data-driven, and application-aware optimization for next-generation sub-3 nm semiconductor and IoT edge computing platforms.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.