Skip to content

Data-Driven Modeling and Circuit-Aware Optimization of Gate-All-Around Multi-Bridge Channel FETs

Oct 2026 · Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers · 0 citations
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

Abstract

Aggressive semiconductor scaling toward sub-3 nm technology nodes requires advanced device optimization frameworks capable of efficiently exploring high-dimensional electrostatic design spaces while preserving physics accuracy and circuit-level applicability. Conventional Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) based optimization requires thousands of simulations, limiting scalability for sub-3 nm device design. This work proposes a physics-driven hybrid machine learning and multi-objective evolutionary optimization framework for electrostatic parameter optimization of sub-3 nm Gate-All-Around Multi-Bridge Channel FET (GAA MBCFET) devices targeting ultra-low-power IoT hardware. The framework integrates calibrated TCAD simulation, hybrid surrogate learning using XGBoost and Random Forest, and cellular multi-objective evolutionary optimization to enable fast design exploration under circuit-aware constraints. The hybrid surrogate achieves improved prediction fidelity (RMSE ≈ 0.47, R 2 up to 0.94) while reducing TCAD simulation requirements by ~78% and optimization runtime by ~65%. Device-level optimization achieves subthreshold swing of 57.6 mV/dec, ~22% DIBL reduction, ~40–45% leakage reduction, ~28–32% ON current improvement, and ~30–35% transconductance improvement. Multi-objective optimization improves Pareto hypervolume by ~32–38% with ~35% faster convergence. Circuit-level validation using a sub-3 nm GAA MBCFET SAR ADC demonstrates ~15–22% switching delay reduction and ~35–45% standby power reduction under low-voltage IoT operation. The proposed framework enables physics-consistent, data-driven, and application-aware optimization for next-generation sub-3 nm semiconductor and IoT edge computing platforms.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.