Skip to content

Dependency Matters: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Explicit Knowledge Grounding

2025 · Neural Information Processing Systems · 2 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Grounded Reasoning in Dependency (GRiD) is introduced, a novel dependency-aware reasoning framework that explicitly grounds reasoning steps in structured knowledge that substantially improves reasoning accuracy, consistency, and faithfulness compared to recent state-of-the-art structured reasoning methods.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) often produce reasoning steps that are superficially coherent yet internally inconsistent, leading to unreliable outputs. Since such failures typically arise from implicit or poorly-grounded knowledge, we introduce Grounded Reasoning in Dependency (GRiD) , a novel dependency-aware reasoning framework that explicitly grounds reasoning steps in structured knowledge. GRiD represents reasoning as a graph consisting of interconnected knowledge extraction nodes and reasoning nodes, enforcing logical consistency through explicit dependencies. Each reasoning step is validated via a lightweight, step-wise verifier that ensures logical correctness relative to its premises. Extensive experiments across diverse reasoning benchmarks—including StrategyQA, CommonsenseQA, GPQA, and TruthfulQA—demonstrate that GRiD substantially improves reasoning accuracy, consistency, and faithfulness compared to recent state-of-the-art structured reasoning methods. Notably, GRiD enhances performance even when applied purely as a lightweight verification module at inference time, underscoring its generalizability and practical utility † .

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Counterfactual Benchmarking and Training for Factuality Consistency and Order-Robust Grounded Reasoning in LLMs over Heterogeneous Knowledge

TKFQA, a factuality consistency benchmark comprising 10,130 question-answering (QA) pairs grounded in tables, texts, and knowledge graphs, is introduced and ORLF, an LLM-agnostic training framework that models cross-context topological relations through knowledge-specific latent vectors is proposed.

Shibo Chu, Yuze Liu, Tiehua Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SymbolLKG: Towards Verifiable Logical Reasoning via Logical Knowledge Graph and Symbolic Solvers

A Neuro-Symbolic architecture that integrates a Logical Knowledge Graph (LKG) with dynamic solver routing, and introduces an ontology-based LKG that treats logical rules and constraints as first-class topological nodes, enabling explicit modeling of dependencies extracted from text.

Hai-Zhao Fan, Yu-Chi Xiong, Jize Wang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Investigating Reasoning in Large Language Models with Counterfactual Knowledge Graphs

This work delineates LLM reasoning boundaries and presents a new paradigm for fine-grained capability assessment, which suggests that genuine reasoning is demonstrated only when a model follows logical rules despite conflicting prior knowledge.

Fangfei Yan, Jianbo Yao, Michael K. Chen et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

REFACT: Adaptive Fact Restatement for Compact and Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

REFACT is an adaptive fact-restatement citation framework that enables LLMs to determine when contextual grounding is needed and selectively restate source facts at appropriate levels of detail for reliable reasoning.

Zhensheng Jin, Xin Dai, Zhenghao Liu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Structure-Internalized Rule Language Model for Faithful Knowledge Graph Reasoning

A Structure-Internalized Rule Language Model (SIRLM) is proposed, which centers on structural rule generation to couple the parametric learning of structural knowledge with the faithfulness evaluation of reasoning logic, enabling LLMs to anchor tightly to KG-grounded evidence.

Xingrui Zhuo, Jiapu Wang, Manzong Huang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Tell-Tale Trace: Detecting Reasoning Failures in LLMs Using Chain-of-Thought Dynamics

Results show that capability failures can manifest as distributed, task-dependent changes in the structure of visible reasoning, and that CoT dynamics agnostic to whether the verbalized trace reflects the model's internal computations can help diagnose and correct failures.

Shashwat Sourav, Aishwarya H. Balwani · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.